Ping times Jan 28 onwards

Started by MarkE, Jan 28, 2009, 13:49:28

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

my ping times keep bouncing bad right this minute,up to 3000 yes not a typo 3000ms :/ i keep dropping off msn irc and ingame every few minutes

Aaron

Mine and a few other's pings here are hovering around 25-35, its ok, but nothing near the usual 15-16 we normally get.
IDNet Home Pro ADSL2+ 4Mbps | Billion BiPAC 7800N

psp83

my ping last night...


[attachment deleted by admin]

hellyl

Quote from: psp83 on Feb 10, 2009, 08:04:15
my ping last night...


Looks very simmilar to mine from last night, this morning its very stable at an average of 25ms.  Ping charts have been emails to IDnet yesterday.

Helen x

Rik

Quote from: drummer on Feb 09, 2009, 23:11:01
Lost http about 30 minutes ago, although Trillian remained connected to ICQ, Yahoo and MSN as I didn't lose sync.

The red patch on the graph, Drummer, was when something fell over and IDNet's website, the forum and mail became unavailable. The pings then time out and produce the red patch. Something similar happened on Sunday from 14:47-15:00.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Simon_idnet

We think we are making good progress with the latency problem. We're certainly receiving far fewer complaints (which must be a good sign!). One of our VPs is still showing suspiciously few active sessions which indicates that it is not being properly utilised. BT are looking into this for us.

The red patch on Drummers ping plot last night was the aftermath of a fibre cut in Amsterdam which brought down all our peers over there and caused our Redbus core router to recalculate all its paths.

If you want to run a ping plot then our Telehouse nameserver (on 212.69.40.3) is probably a better target as our website has quite a workload and so may give more variable results.

Regards
Simon

Rik

Thanks for the update, Simon. I think the world is conspiring against you at the moment. :(
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Simon

Or, at least, the Dutch.  ::)
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

uxbod

Geen Terugtocht, Geen Overgave... het Netwerk is van ons :evil:

David

 :ithank:  Simon...I will leave it to you,I pinged twice but it proved double Dutch   ;D

Thanks again  :thumb:
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

hellyl

Well after posting that my pings have leveled again this morning, started the ping plotter around 11am and they up and down like a yo yo, ping graphs can become a little obsessive I have found   ;D.  Hopefully will all be sorted soon.   :fingers:


Helen x

drummer

Thanks for the info Rik and Simon.  Am now using 212.69.40.3.
To stay is death but to flee is life.

Sebby

Thanks for the update, Simon. :)

Steve

#638
Certainly still appears to be somewhat erratic

Edit: I never pressed post goodness knows what happened then :blush:
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

I have not a problem my daughters schools computers had problems on the net today so its the exchange works


Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Steve

#640
Certainly still appears to be somewhat erratic, the spikes are still very evident from my end

212.69.40.3



[attachment deleted by admin]
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Mine have been pretty good today. I use PingGraph to log anything over 40ms. These are they from 8:30 until now:

Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:17:32, 48ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:24:02, 42ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:47:22, 238ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:47:32, 184ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:47:42, 268ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:56:02, 108ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:56:12, 106ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:57:32, 201ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:58:12, 42ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  09:59:42, 143ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  10:03:12, 209ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  10:03:22, 158ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  10:14:11, 47ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  10:25:31, 216ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:02:35, 255ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:02:45, 63ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:06:45, 258ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:06:55, 182ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:07:15, 48ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:47:25, 61ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:49:35, 103ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:49:45, 90ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:50:25, 260ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:50:35, 94ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:51:05, 153ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  14:55:15, 64ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  15:03:45, 62ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  15:13:35, 93ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  15:13:45, 292ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  15:13:55, 225ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  15:16:25, 90ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  15:20:45, 161ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  15:22:18, 3000ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  15:41:24, 45ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  15:55:37, 3000ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  16:13:04, 50ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  16:20:34, 44ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  16:35:47, 3000ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  16:38:24, 45ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  16:40:57, 3000ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  16:56:57, 3000ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  17:10:44, 48ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  17:41:54, 45ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  17:42:24, 43ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  17:43:14, 88ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  17:44:24, 51ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  17:44:34, 98ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  17:45:14, 45ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  17:50:14, 42ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  17:50:44, 53ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  18:02:44, 41ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  18:05:54, 89ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  18:06:14, 53ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  18:06:24, 45ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  18:06:34, 84ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  18:06:44, 43ms
Tue 10 Feb 2009  18:08:14, 42ms

Average was 24ms.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

Quote from: stevethegas on Feb 10, 2009, 18:44:11
Certainly still appears to be somewhat erratic, the spikes are still very evident from my end

What were you pinging, Steve?
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Might be worth letting support have your graphs then, Steve, because they are very different from mine.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Aaron

Soaring back up again :/

Tracing route to resolver1.idnet.net [212.69.40.3]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2   147 ms   130 ms   163 ms  telehouse-gw2-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.55]
  3   178 ms   168 ms   167 ms  telehouse-gw1-fa0-0.400.idnet.net [212.69.63.241]
  4   179 ms   172 ms   168 ms  resolver1.idnet.net [212.69.40.3]
IDNet Home Pro ADSL2+ 4Mbps | Billion BiPAC 7800N

Lance

Thanks for the update, Simon.
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Mytheroo

#649
having problems also:

Ping statistics for 212.69.40.3:
    Packets: Sent = 117, Received = 116, Lost = 1 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 101ms, Maximum = 189ms, Average = 160ms

in fairness mine are pretty steady, just 5x the normal :-)

edit:   just rang my landline from mobile (this drops the sync to exchange still) so router tried sync'ing a few times b4 I hung up, it's sync'ed at almost same speed but now the ping results are:

Ping statistics for 212.69.40.3:
    Packets: Sent = 127, Received = 127, Lost = 0 (0% los
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 114ms, Average = 47ms

I had reset ADSL line earlier but I didn't powercycle it (nor this time) but it seems to have done something

bbc.co.uk is back to 28ms
jolt.co.uk is 33ms
IDnet.com back to 25ms

all were  ~130ms a few minutes earlier
There are 10 kinds of people, those who understand binary and those who don't.