Ping times Jan 28 onwards

Started by MarkE, Jan 28, 2009, 13:49:28

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DarkStar

My PingGraph has had a nice even line between 35/45 since early yesterday and speeds had been consistent at just below 2000. Now I have just come back from tea and speed has gone to the dogs and pings through the roof. Don't have a current ping graph, some fool turned it off  :mad: (not me)
I had a reading of 380 just a little while ago.

Ian

Pinging 212.69.40.3 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.40.3: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=61
Reply from 212.69.40.3: bytes=32 time=165ms TTL=61
Reply from 212.69.40.3: bytes=32 time=124ms TTL=61
Reply from 212.69.40.3: bytes=32 time=163ms TTL=61

Ping statistics for 212.69.40.3:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 124ms, Maximum = 165ms, Average = 149ms



Tracing route to resolver1.idnet.net [212.69.40.3]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2   177 ms   139 ms   145 ms  telehouse-gw2-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.55]
  3   190 ms   183 ms   161 ms  telehouse-gw1-fa0-0.400.idnet.net [212.69.63.241
]
  4   187 ms   188 ms   190 ms  resolver1.idnet.net [212.69.40.3]

Trace complete.

Ian

David

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\David>ping idnet.net

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=139ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=154ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=147ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 139ms, Maximum = 154ms, Average = 147ms

C:\Users\David>
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

David

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\David>ping idnet.net

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 14ms, Average = 12ms


Sorry to post just want to compare the two this one taken earlier today hope no-one minds
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Lance

Reply #701 is bad, but #702 very good, David.
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Lance

Unfortunately so. When were they both run?
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

One .the lowest one was this morning..the higher one after tonights drop
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

ducky22

2:19am - awesome pings, very fast.

M:\>ping idnet.com

Pinging idnet.com [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=59

841k/second on a download.

David

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\David>ping idnet.net

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 12ms, Maximum = 17ms, Average = 14ms

C:\Users\David>

Looks like it has recovered for me .I am only posting in a bid to help pinpoint the problem and no other reason
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

Mine are fine too, David. :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Steve

No issues for me this am. I am assuming the evening problems are due to congestion on one of the pipes. If you can be manually switched to another central am I correct in presuming this is a temporary fix? If you then drop PPP for any reason outside "office hours" you are presumably potentially back to square one until the issue is resolved. Hopefully a weeks walking in the Peak District will solve the problem for me.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

It doesn't appear to be congestion at this point, Steve, but IDNet have identified a router problem which could have been the cause.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

 :fingers: Expect they need a break as well
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Mohux_Jnr

My pings have been stable for 48 hours  :thumb:, just losing browsing capability on the odd occasion several times a day but I can live with that.

Rik

That may be explained by Simon's announcement about the router...
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

I think they have worked so hard and under,I would imagine unbearable pressure,they deserve any praise they get in my book  :thumb:
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Ray

Quote from: badpianoplayer on Feb 12, 2009, 12:05:13
I think they have worked so hard and under,I would imagine unbearable pressure,they deserve any praise they get in my book  :thumb:

I'll second that, David.  :thumb:
Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Dare I say it. Things looking much better this early evening, ping times for me are back to normal and browsing is very snappy :fingers: :fingers: No doubt that's put the kaibosh on it.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

I'm seeing much better pings today, Steve, with more consistency.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Dopamine

Quote from: Rik on Feb 12, 2009, 17:44:16
I'm seeing much better pings today, Steve, with more consistency.

So was I until about 30 minutes ago. UK sites are slow, many US sites are timing out.
I'm not sure if I'm pinging correctly - should I type "ping xxx.com" or "ping www xxx.com"? - but here are my results:



Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\>ping bbc.co.uk
Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=168ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=166ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=121

Ping statistics for 212.58.224.138:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 140ms, Maximum = 168ms, Average = 156ms

C:\>ping idnet.com
Pinging idnet.com [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=160ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 111ms, Maximum = 178ms, Average = 144ms

C:\>ping nbc.com
Pinging nbc.com [64.210.192.67] with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 64.210.192.67:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

C:\>ping cnn.com
Pinging cnn.com [157.166.226.25] with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 157.166.226.25:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

C:\>ping google.com
Pinging google.com [209.85.171.100] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=299ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=293ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.85.171.100: bytes=32 time=327ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 209.85.171.100:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 269ms, Maximum = 327ms, Average = 297ms

C:\>ping google.co.uk
Pinging google.co.uk [66.249.93.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.249.93.104: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=246
Reply from 66.249.93.104: bytes=32 time=153ms TTL=246
Reply from 66.249.93.104: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=246
Reply from 66.249.93.104: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 66.249.93.104:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 146ms, Maximum = 179ms, Average = 162ms

Rik

Very different to my results, Dopamine:

ping bbc.co.uk

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 212.58.224.138:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 23ms, Average = 22ms

ping www.idnet.net

Pinging www.idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 21ms

ping nbc.com

Pinging nbc.com [64.210.192.67] with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.


ping www.nbc.com

Pinging a1669.g.akamai.net [88.221.26.49] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 88.221.26.49: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=60
Reply from 88.221.26.49: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=60
Reply from 88.221.26.49: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=60
Reply from 88.221.26.49: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 88.221.26.49:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 22ms, Average = 21ms

ping www.cnn.com

Pinging www.cnn.com [64.236.90.21] with 32 bytes of data:

Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 64.236.90.21:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

ping google.com

Pinging google.com [74.125.45.100] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 74.125.45.100: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=244
Reply from 74.125.45.100: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=244
Reply from 74.125.45.100: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=244
Reply from 74.125.45.100: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=244

Ping statistics for 74.125.45.100:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 115ms, Average = 113ms

ping google.co.uk

Pinging google.co.uk [72.14.221.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.14.221.104: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=246
Reply from 72.14.221.104: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=246
Reply from 72.14.221.104: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=246
Reply from 72.14.221.104: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=246

Ping statistics for 72.14.221.104:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 42ms, Average = 41ms

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

NBC seems to have sprung to life now:

tracert www.nbc.com

Tracing route to a1669.g.akamai.net [88.221.26.49]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  home [192.168.1.254]
  2    25 ms    22 ms    25 ms  telehouse-gw2-lo1.idnet.net [212.69.63.51]
  3    23 ms    23 ms    21 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [212.69.63.243]
  4    23 ms    21 ms    23 ms  lonap.netarch.akamai.com [193.203.5.72]
  5    23 ms    23 ms    25 ms  a88-221-26-49.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com [88.221.26.49]
Trace complete.

ping www.nbc.com

Pinging a1669.g.akamai.net [88.221.26.49] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 88.221.26.49: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=60
Reply from 88.221.26.49: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=60
Reply from 88.221.26.49: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=60
Reply from 88.221.26.49: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 88.221.26.49:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 22ms, Average = 21ms
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

#724
This time of the evening has been poor for me for the last 11 days but ok at present

Test1 comprises of Best Effort Test:  -provides background information.
   Your DSL connection rate: 8128 kbps(DOWN-STREAM),  448 kbps(UP-STREAM)
   IP profile for your line is - 7150 kbps
   Actual IP throughput achieved during the test was - 6620 kbps

If you wisMicrosoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\Steve>ping idnet.net

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 17ms

C:\Users\Steve>ping bbc.co.uk

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 212.58.224.138:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 15ms, Maximum = 47ms, Average = 23ms

C:\Users\Steve>ping google.co.uk

Pinging google.co.uk [216.239.59.104] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=247
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=247
Reply from 216.239.59.104: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=247

Ping statistics for 216.239.59.104:
   Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 29ms



Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.