Ping times Jan 28 onwards

Started by MarkE, Jan 28, 2009, 13:49:28

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: Rik on Jan 28, 2009, 13:02:21
Today's is down to the router upgrade, Mark, as detailed in 'Announcements'.

ah ok,only ping times have gone whack to multiplay.co.uk


Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=124

Sebby


MarkE

Quote from: Sebby on Jan 28, 2009, 13:49:58
Let IDNet know.

been there got the tshirt and coat and soon walking shoes...


multiplay.co.uk

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=124


router rebooted numerous times pings ingame of 140ms well done Idnet!!!

Rik

I don't think it's as simple as IDNet:

ping multiplay.co.uk

Pinging multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.22] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 34ms, Average = 29ms

but if you're not happy then your best bet is to try another ISP.

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ray

Something seems to be amiss somewhere, Rik, my pings are not good at the moment, although I don't game so they don't affect me.

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

Pinging multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.22] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 82ms, Average = 55ms

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 212.58.224.138:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 81ms, Maximum = 110ms, Average = 100ms
Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Simon

Can't profess to know what it means, but for what it's worth:

Pinging multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.22] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 34ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 37ms
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

I'm not seeing an issue, Ray, and we should be on the same pipe:

ping multiplay.co.uk

Pinging multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.22] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 24ms, Average = 22ms

ping bbc.co.uk

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 212.58.224.138:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 25ms, Average = 23ms

If it continues, run a longer ping, eg 10-20 pings, then let support have the result.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ray

Strange, Rik, mine are still about 3 times higher than yours, they're usually about the same as yours.  :-\
Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

It's definitely one for support if it continues, Ray. (Do you think I have a charmed path? ;))
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ray

Quote from: Rik on Jan 31, 2009, 15:12:30
It's definitely one for support if it continues, Ray. (Do you think I have a charmed path? ;))

Yes, Rik, I reckon you've got your own private pipe into Idnet.  ;D  ;)
Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Simon brought a bit of wet string over at Xmas... :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Simon

I'd rather have had a hamper!  ;D
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

If I had a hamper,I,d hamper out danger  ;D
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

You watched American Folk too, eh?
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

Its no picnic being me you know........we all have our crosses to bear and I dont like making a fuss
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Ray

Just got these results using WinMTR: -



[attachment deleted by admin]
Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

MarkE

I take it this problem wouldnt be caused by the idnet new service rollout of adsl2? Just hair pullingly annoying,even webpages are crawling.

Rik

No, there is no rollout unless you're on a WBC-enabled exchange and signed up to test.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

MarkE

Well I have left a message on Simons answerphone regarding this problem


Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=124

Rik

Don't be surprised if you don't hear before Monday, pings are not normally regarded as an emergency.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

MarkE

#21
Quote from: Rik on Jan 31, 2009, 19:05:35
Don't be surprised if you don't hear before Monday, pings are not normally regarded as an emergency.


No but maybe customers taking their good money elsehwere might be? I have a national team match tomorrow for the uk,and its currently up to 200ms,i cant even barely browse the web
isnt that the barest i should be able to do on a £34 a month connection?


I just also tried pinging  www.idnet.net and got

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=59

Lance

Mark, I see from reading back through the posts that you have tried rebooting your router several times - but have you left it off for half hour or so? I know this is normally the method to clear a stale session but it can also help with other issues.

FWIW here is my ping to the same IP address in your post above:

C:\Users\Lance>ping 85.236.96.22

Pinging 85.236.96.22 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 31ms, Average = 30ms
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

Quote from: MarkE on Jan 31, 2009, 19:41:44

No but maybe customers taking their good money elsehwere might be? I have a national team match tomorrow for the uk,and its currently up to 200ms,i cant even barely browse the web
isnt that the barest i should be able to do on a £34 a month connection?


I just also tried pinging  www.idnet.net and got

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=59


All we can advise is that you get in contact with IDNet, which you have.

ducky22

Back to the dial up days (nearly!)... Already checked with various computers and only one turned on at a time. Browsing is also laggy. Anyone else having problems today? Download speed down from 830k/second to 45k/second.

Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2   166 ms   182 ms   178 ms  telehouse-gw4-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.97]
  3   148 ms   165 ms   156 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [212.69.63.243]

  4   164 ms   147 ms   139 ms  rt-lonap-b.thdo.bbc.co.uk [193.203.5.91]
  5   156 ms   142 ms   121 ms  212.58.238.133
  6   149 ms   136 ms   141 ms  virtual-vip.thdo.bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138]

Trace complete.

M:\>