Anyone else lose PPP

Started by Rik, Feb 07, 2009, 12:44:59

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rik

12:42, for just under a minute?
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

No not me, just can't access MS support since about that time
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

gyruss

Yes, total loss of internet at around that time.  Router's internet light went off.. then came back on soon after.
Jase


David

Yes just got back Rik  ???
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

arturus

Mine went down around the same time and it still is :(

Peyr

Yep, it died and just came back up now.

arturus


Baz

just saw this after posting elsewhere  :) checked router logs and looks like no drop here. but slow as i said in other post

Rik

Looking at my ping log, it gives a longer drop out, 12:39-12:42.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Quote from: Rik on Feb 07, 2009, 12:48:47
It's OK for me, Steve.

It is ok for me now I wonder whether they were related
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

I don't know, Steve, but it seems a strange coincidence if they weren't.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ann

I lost ppp twice in quick succession, according to the log, in all lasting about 4 minutes.

Rik

That's about what I saw, Ann, there was a brief return of service in the middle of my span.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Glenn

My router retrained at 12.31
Glenn
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

I wonder if this was a rolling problem, then?
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

07/02/09 13:02:15
Speed Down    3211.15 Kbps ( 3.1 Mbps )
Speed Up    379.60 Kbps ( 0.4 Mbps )
Port    8095
Server    speedtest1.thinkbroadband.com
IP Address    212.69.45.185

This is showing slower than normal......would a reboot help this  :dunno:
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

It might, David, but it could be congestion somewhere.

Try this one:

http://www.speedtest.bbmax.co.uk/
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ray

Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

IDNet are picking on me. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Quote from: badpianoplayer on Feb 07, 2009, 13:04:38

This is showing slower than normal......would a reboot help this  :dunno:

If your ping times are ok I'd leave it alone
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ray

Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

zappaDPJ

I've had no loss of PPP today but my throughput on the down stream is less than half of what it usually is and more importantly for me my latency is abysmal. What I do find strange is that individual pings to a location varying quite a lot e.g.

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\zappaDPJ>ping www.idnet.com -n 50

Pinging www.idnet.com [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
   Packets: Sent = 50, Received = 50, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
   Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 146ms, Average = 54ms

C:\Users\zappaDPJ>
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

t might, David, but it could be congestion somewhere.

Try this one:
Download Speed: 3152 kbps (394 KB/sec )   Upload Speed: 347 kbps (43.4 KB/sec )

Ping 241  :dunno:

This site wont let me log in  :dunno:

Speed is the same rougly...Im not bothered really will see later
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

If things don't improve, a reboot may help.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.