MS no-frills security scanner gets thumbs up in early tests

Started by Noreen, Jun 24, 2009, 18:45:08

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Noreen

QuoteMicrosoft's limited but free-of-extra-charge anti-malware scanner has performed creditably in early tests.

Independent testing lab AV-test.org put Microsoft Security Essentials through its paces, after downloading a beta version of the software following its limited release on Tuesday.

The application, which lacks personal firewall or spam filtering features, is designed to provide consumers with basic protection against Trojans, computer viruses and rootkits...................
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/24/ms_morro_review/

Sebby

That's promising. Okay, I wouldn't use it, but at least it looks like it's going to be a decent free option.

Simon

Indeed.  What they need to do, is take it a step further, and disable internet access on machines when the security software is not functioning, not present, or out of date.
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

That's against human rights, no doubt. It's our right to expose ourselves to malware, viruses and trojans. :tongue:

Simon

By all means expose yourself, Seb, but not when I'm looking, please.  ;)
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

Quote from: Simon on Jun 24, 2009, 23:45:08
By all means expose yourself, Seb, but not when I'm looking, please.  ;)
Thats why he has a Mac Simon, you know these flashers  ;)
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

somanyholes

of interest ....

http://preachsecurity.blogspot.com/2009/06/microsoft-security-essentials-road-test.html

QuoteBottom Line: The verdict, unfortuntaely folks... is that Microsoft's Security Essentials is essentially lacking on the detection front. In a world where Internet-borne threats are polymorphic, stealth, and ever-changing the Security Essentials tool fails to deliver real protection against the nasty things that go bump on the 'net. Even when compared against other freeware detection engines (such as AVG) Microsoft's engine still competes poorly, since every single piece of malware that Security Essentials missed, AVG's scanner caught.

somanyholes

for those who still think any av product is good. (this vid shows all engines failing to detect bad code without doing anything amazing)

http://vimeo.com/2308915?pg=embed&sec=&hd=1


Simon

I certainly don't think any AV is 100% foolproof, and it's as much about 'safe surfing' as anything else.
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

Quote from: Simon on Jun 24, 2009, 23:45:08
By all means expose yourself, Seb, but not when I'm looking, please.  ;)

:hehe:

Quote from: Gary on Jun 25, 2009, 06:29:16
Thats why he has a Mac Simon, you know these flashers  ;)

It's more the no anti-virus, no anti-malware and no registry to clog up the machine to be honest. ;)

Gary

Quote from: Sebby on Jun 25, 2009, 13:24:43
:hehe:

It's more the no anti-virus, no anti-malware and no registry to clog up the machine to be honest. ;)
No registry :bawl: no anti malware/virus....you can catch cold down those dark allies at night you know  ;) ;D
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Sebby


colonelsun

It may be free and getting good test results but the Microsoft name still puts me off. And to be honest even if the program offered everything i would get with a paid for version....i'd still be put off by the Microsoft name.