Upped to ADSL2+ and still on the dark age

Started by troesma, Jul 09, 2009, 12:19:09

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Steve

Hopefully it will become more tolerant with age. :(
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Simon

Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Simon

Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

BT don't want exchanges full of both MSANs and DSLAMs, nor, I suspect, do they want to maintain centrals and hostlinks. In time, we'll all connect to the same equipment, we may just appear to be on different services.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

I think what we have to focus on is FTTC. It should help a significant amount of people to a great extent. The issue is not ADSL2+ itself, it's the poor state of the network.

Rik

Absolutely, Seb. I'm just 213m from my cabinet.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

dujas

The other good thing about FTTC is that BT have said "anything below 15Mbps [downstream] would be considered a fault and require fixing".

Rik

That's before they install it, of course. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.


troesma

Back to things, checked and Cisco does NOT support CLI on the Linksys WAG160N modem/router so I'm pretty much scr***d as even when I could access the router in debug mode, I can't do a thing with that. Pants (and a word of caution to anyone who's into tweaking... Linkysis, at least with the current firmware, don't allow you to.) BTW the WAG160N is based on the Broadcom 6348 chipset.

Maybe on Monday I'm gonna ask IDNet to ask for a forced change to BT to 9db and see how it goes. Interestingly, as I'm also on the FAST channel maybe I could squeeze some more speed if I get Interleaved. But maybe best to go 1 step at a time.

Rik

I would definitely take it one step at a time, or you'll never know what worked for you. There is a bigger range of interleaving with WBC than Max, which suggests BT were preparing for greater instability.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

troesma

Starting to fancy this thing of being a bit of guinea pig, if it also helps others...  :thumb:

Bill

Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

troesma

Update..

Nothing much changed this AM. Sent e-mail to Miriam @ IDNT support to ask if they can place a request to BT to change my NM to 9db and see how things go. Hope I get and answer from the IDnet support folks soon :fingers:

Will keep you posted. Guess the change will take some days to materialise...

pup

Quote from: Rik on Jul 18, 2009, 15:54:10
Absolutely, Seb. I'm just 213m from my cabinet.

Drinks cabinet?  :cheers: thats a long way to crawl
Pup

Sitting on the fence......
And Laughing at both sides.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

troesma

OK, so it's TUE 20:26 and still no reply from Miriam/IDNet support. A bit pissed-off TBH. So it's 48 hrs since my e-mail request and no-one even had a word just to say "yes we can do it" or "no we can't". Nothing, zip, zada, zilch. Let's see what happens tomorrow...  :rant2:

Simon

They may still be awaiting a response from BT, but they should have let you know if that's the case.  :(
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Quote from: troesma on Jul 21, 2009, 20:28:50
OK, so it's TUE 20:26 and still no reply from Miriam/IDNet support. A bit pissed-off TBH. So it's 48 hrs since my e-mail request and no-one even had a word just to say "yes we can do it" or "no we can't". Nothing, zip, zada, zilch. Let's see what happens tomorrow...  :rant2:

To be fair, you sent the email on a Sunday, when the offices are closed. Support are particularly busy right now, and emails are not being replied to in 5 minutes, or even 24 hours, but I understand that your request will be actioned today. Essentially, I would advise anyone who wants something done quickly to phone IDNet. The call is free, you won't be kept hanging on for 45 minutes and you will speak to someone who can acton your request.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

troesma

Yup, maybe I got a bit OTT so apologies (but a request passed on Sunday would have to be seen MON first time AM and my post was TUE after offices closing, so that makes 48 hours equivalent office time...)

Got an e-mail from Brian today, he suggests the change will become effective tomorrow (or so say BT). Thanks a lot. Let's see where all this goes. Guess the ADSL2+ product is giving the guys a bit of a headache.