High pings again

dujas · Jul 27, 2009, 14:10:35

This Thursday (the 30th) onwards will be 'interesting' as it's when the Ashes resumes, the third test at Edgbaston.

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 14:28:18

Quote from: Pmx on Jul 27, 2009, 13:38:22
As requested earlier, this is my ping/trace into idnet now, with interleaving on. Below is how it was when I was with Idnet, as you can see the difference is pretty significant!

It is, isn't it.

Thanks for that.

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 14:28:31

Quote from: dujas on Jul 27, 2009, 14:10:35
This Thursday (the 30th) onwards will be 'interesting' as it's when the Ashes resumes, the third test at Edgbaston.

Don't.

JB · Jul 27, 2009, 16:51:28

To the untrained eye here it looks like there is a problem with IDNet's network at Telehouse, coupled with a 4% packet loss at the first node. The graphic below shows the rates I can achieve (best case) and how bad it can be (worst case). All over the period of half a minute

I have submitted a ticket. Guess I'll wait and see.

[attachment deleted by admin]

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 16:56:44

Yours was one of the cases I forwarded to support about an hour ago, JB. Have you seen no improvement? (ie when was that tracert?)

JB · Jul 27, 2009, 17:26:47

It was two minutes before the post Rik.

JB · Jul 27, 2009, 17:30:24

Still totally up and down Rik.

Just done this one at 1728.

[attachment deleted by admin]

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 17:37:52

Thanks, JB, your case is being looked at.

Simon_idnet · Jul 27, 2009, 17:41:03

Hi All

Sometimes BT send more connections to us down some pipes than others, which therefore become congested. We then have to manually move customers across to other pipes in order to get the traffic loads on the Centrals properly balanced again. We have enough aggregated bandwidth capacity to cope with normal loads and so once we can get back to regular levels things should improve.

Regards
Simon

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 17:57:41

Thanks, Simon.

quandam · Jul 27, 2009, 18:21:57

Quote from: Rik on Jul 27, 2009, 17:57:41
Thanks, Simon.

Rik

I bet you are not a little relieved that Simon has provided an explanation of the possible culprit, hopefully things will get sorted soon

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 18:22:53

Indeed I am, Q.

quandam · Jul 27, 2009, 18:24:31

Keep your chin up

Glenn · Jul 27, 2009, 18:28:06

Just to add another graph to the collection, I have been getting a spike approximately every 35 - 40 seconds

[attachment deleted by admin]

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 18:32:58

Quote from: quandam on Jul 27, 2009, 18:24:31
Keep your chin up

It's my stomach I'm trying to keep up.

Glenn · Jul 27, 2009, 18:34:27

You need a belt and braces

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 18:37:16

A corset, more like. Time to order a new kilt with reinforced gusset methinks.

quandam · Jul 27, 2009, 18:44:04

Quote from: Rik on Jul 27, 2009, 18:37:16
A corset, more like. Time to order a new kilt with reinforced gusset methinks.

Thanks for keeping the public face of IDNet afloat via IDNetters

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 18:44:57

My pleasure.

zappaDPJ · Jul 27, 2009, 18:50:20

Quote from: Glenn on Jul 27, 2009, 18:28:06
Just to add another graph to the collection, I have been getting a spike approximately every 35 - 40 seconds

Glenn that graph is of particular interest to me. I don't suppose you have another PC/Laptop that you can use to see if you get the same regular pulse?

Glenn · Jul 27, 2009, 18:53:26

I'll try from my racing (gaming) PC

Rik · Jul 27, 2009, 18:53:31

With a pulse rate that low, I'd be reaching for the defibrillator.

Glenn · Jul 27, 2009, 19:25:57

It's worse here

[attachment deleted by admin]

MarkE · Jul 27, 2009, 19:29:54

nice tits up,used my mac code today gone with Aquiss .

I expect more will leave with gaming pigns that resemble a shambles...

Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=124

Sebby · Jul 27, 2009, 19:31:31

Good luck with Enta.