Announcement re Peterborough BRAS issue

Started by Glenn, Dec 21, 2009, 13:54:13

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

klipp

PING www.idnet.net (212.69.36.10): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=30.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=30.0 ms

--- 212.69.36.10 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 50% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 30.0/30.0/30.0 ms

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

cwmusson


$ ping www.idnet.net
ping: unknown host www.idnet.net

$ ping 212.69.36.10
PING 212.69.36.10 (212.69.36.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=36.7 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=11 ttl=58 time=36.7 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=12 ttl=58 time=37.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=13 ttl=58 time=35.8 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=14 ttl=58 time=88.7 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=22 ttl=58 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=24 ttl=58 time=36.1 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=26 ttl=58 time=36.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=29 ttl=58 time=36.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=32 ttl=58 time=36.2 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=33 ttl=58 time=35.7 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=34 ttl=58 time=36.6 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=38 ttl=58 time=36.3 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=39 ttl=58 time=36.7 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=40 ttl=58 time=36.7 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=45 ttl=58 time=37.6 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=46 ttl=58 time=36.7 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=49 ttl=58 time=36.6 ms
64 bytes from 212.69.36.10: icmp_seq=50 ttl=58 time=36.7 ms
^C
--- 212.69.36.10 ping statistics ---
50 packets transmitted, 19 received, 62% packet loss, time 49141ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 35.786/39.274/88.768/11.675 ms


klipp

I can currently access most sites again.:)

However.. still very slow and laggy, but better than nothing.

klipp

I guess I spoke too soon.  It's back to its glorious worst!!

Andez

Same here - slow and intermittent connection over the last few days. Worse in the evenings.

Steve

 :welc: :karma:

Interestingly but perhaps not totally unrelated BT have confirmed that congestion on the Birmingham 20 CN BRAS is caused by themselves throttling their own network which they then obviously then pass on to the ISP. I think it's all falling apart. I think we're in for a rocky ride whilst adslmax,adsl2+ and now FTTC are all in the same pot.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

klipp

We on the Peterborough node are into month 2 of only having internet for 12 out of 24 hours each day, so I suspect you're right about it being a problem for the long-haul.  BT claim to be monitoring Peterborough node as we speak, yet nothing's been fixed.

I can't wait to hear BT's spin tomorrow...

Simon

Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

cwmusson

Quote from: klipp on Jan 04, 2010, 21:59:51
We on the Peterborough node are into month 2 of only having internet for 12 out of 24 hours each day

... and I'm out at work for most of the good half day :sigh:

cwmusson

It's still broken, so that's no usable connection for the entire evening once again.

cwmusson

The problems lasted until 5.15am this time.

PuncH

I'm not normally one to jump on the compensation bandwagon, but I think on this occasion we're well and truly due something from BT.

Ray

Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

klipp

Forget about us being compensated.  It'll never happen.

The aaisp blog suggests that tonight we might be looking forward to an evening of having a working connection.  Here's hoping.

Simon

I think I'm right in saying that BT have no obligation to provide a broadband service.  A perfect get out to avoid paying compensation.  :dunno:
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sarah

Quote from: klipp on Jan 05, 2010, 13:40:53
Here's hoping.
Joining you in hoping, Klipp. I'd been away and having returned Sunday night to the same problem, the updates here are very useful.

Glenn

Quote from: Simon on Jan 05, 2010, 14:21:15
I think I'm right in saying that BT have no obligation to provide a broadband service.  A perfect get out to avoid paying compensation.  :dunno:

Just voice and 28k data I believe.
Glenn
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Although that applies to the level of service, there may be a separate SLA for those on broadband who's service is interrupted. If enough people were to email Ian Livingstone, there would probably be a payout.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

cwmusson

It's that time of the evening and the internet is still working  :fingers:

Technical Ben

Well I didn't download anything yesterday, and I am back at work this week. II also don't stay up to the early hours of the morning. So I think I'm off the hook.  :duck:
I'm only 20 miles from Peterborough, but have not had any problems. I get occasional breaks or slowdowns in connection, but it's usually due to me tripping over the router.
However, I don't know what pipe I am routed through. How do I find out?
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

Rik

Ask IDNet, Ben. They will know which node you're on. When you reach the IDNet network, we're now all on the same hostlink.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

PuncH


Rik

I think BT have everything crossed too, Jonathan.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

klipp

My internet still works........ *faints*