FTTC goes mainstream

Started by dujas, Jan 21, 2010, 12:10:20

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dujas

BT retail will be taking orders for FTTC products from the 25th of January, the service is called BT Infinity.

Simon

Is that because it will be infinitely bad?  ;D
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

The worst lager in the world   ;D

I just checked my number and according to Bt........I would LOSE speed  ;D
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Inkblot

Quote from: David on Jan 21, 2010, 12:39:22
The worst lager in the world   ;D

I just checked my number and according to Bt........I would LOSE speed  ;D

Same here - BT are quoting me 6m which is a lot slower than my old IDNet Max (Usually synched at 8m) or my current IDNet ADSL2+ (Usually synchs at around 11m)

David

Like me you are going to sign up then ink ?  :hehe:
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Sebby

I can't wait to see what happens to BT's network. :)

Rik

Congestion, congestion, congestion...
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Technical Ben

The BT "can I get it" button says "Great news! We have tested your line and you can get the UK's most complete broadband, BT Total Broadband. you can get: 6.5mb".
So it defaults to ASDL2 etc if you cannot get FTTC. However, I they are cheaky there and don't make that obvious. So would that explain the slow speeds they are talking about?
Does FTTC suffer from the same troube that effects ASDL? I would have thought there is no "noise" on the line (unless the badgers all have torches now :D). But what about distance?
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

David

Well they are very sett in their ways  ;D
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

Distance shouldn't matter, Ben, as fibre can have noiseless repeaters on long runs.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Noreen

Quote from: Simon on Jan 21, 2010, 12:11:53
Is that because it will be infinitely bad?  ;D
Doesn't the "I" in IDNet stand for "Infinity"? ;D

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

Quote from: Noreen on Jan 21, 2010, 17:48:49
Doesn't the "I" in IDNet stand for "Infinity"? ;D

And beyond  ;D
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

Where no man has ever exchanged packets.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

 :zip: :hide2: You are not getting me banned  ;D
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

 ;D

Go on, it's ages since I've done that...  :evil:
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Fox

Quote from: Rik on Jan 21, 2010, 18:08:00
Go on, it's ages since I've done that...  :evil:

But I still think it was a bit harsh banning your own wife Rik  :pullface:
True power doesn't lie with the people who cast the votes, it lies with the people who count them



D-Dan

I just did the test - but I'm not convinced it is testing FTTC speed. It said I could get something approximating what I already have, too ( though slower) despite my being in eyesight of the cabinet, and in terms of distance, maybe 200 yards.

I think the speed estimation is still based on the copper connection.

We are due to go live with FTTC here in March (though I've yet to see a BT engineer even approach the cabinet) so maybe I'll try again after that.

Steve
Have I lost my way?



This post doesn't necessarily represent even my own opinions, let alone anyone else's

esh

To be honest 8Mbit down is just dandy, but I could really do with that upband rate. That said 800Kbit is godlike compared to the 128Kbit I used to run on.
CompuServe 28.8k/33.6k 1994-1998, BT 56k 1998-2001, NTL Cable 512k 2001-2004, 2x F2S 1M 2004-2008, IDNet 8M 2008 - LLU 11M 2011

DarkStar

Just tried it and says I can get 2.5mb download now but the top line says they are upgrading my exchange and I will be able to get the same 2.5mb download when upgraded 29 June 2010. That will be good  ::)
According to the info in my IDNet portal I am/was due to be upgraded in Feb 2010, it looks as though there is another time slip. Well, fancy that. It will have slipped by over 18 months since BT first gave an activation date for my exchange.
Although I'm not all that far from Martlesham there obviously isn't a BT executive living in my neck of the woods  :whistle:
WBC - I'll believe when I see it never mind FTTC.


[attachment deleted by admin]
Ian

Rik

The slippages on WBC have been unforgivable, especially when combined with the backhaul issues. WE can only hope BT learn from it. Sadly, I fear they will not have done.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Noreen

My nephew who works for BT on the new fibre installations (in office) is working seven days a week at the moment!

Rik

But is he actually doing anything, Noreen. ;)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.