Future XP problems

Started by Glenn, Mar 09, 2010, 14:22:31

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

quandam

Thanks for the info guys. I think I might wait until Service Pack 1 is issued or at least let a year elapse before making the move. Have to say, that XP has been rock solid for me without any security probs (that I am aware of) for many many years, crashes really have been minimal, it has been a good friend.

zappaDPJ

I as you know have had a few issues running the 64 bit version of 7 but it won't stop me running it as it's clearly a better product than Vista. I will however install and run the 32 bit version to try and get a little more compatibility with some older hardware I have and a few of the applications and gizmos I use regularly that won't run.

So far I can't find much to criticise although I don't like the visual appearance of the launch bar. It uses a lot of space but is quite stark graphically, particularly on the right hand side. The only other thing that concerned me a little is how much memory my default installation was using, well over 1 GB. That seems a little excessive to me and quite a bit more than Vista filled with start up applications.
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

talos

I shall stick with XP as long as I can, it's the only Microsoft OS I feel I can trust

Gary

Quote from: zappaDPJ on Mar 10, 2010, 10:03:19
I as you know have had a few issues running the 64 bit version of 7 but it won't stop me running it as it's clearly a better product than Vista. I will however install and run the 32 bit version to try and get a little more compatibility with some older hardware I have and a few of the applications and gizmos I use regularly that won't run.

So far I can't find much to criticise although I don't like the visual appearance of the launch bar. It uses a lot of space but is quite stark graphically, particularly on the right hand side. The only other thing that concerned me a little is how much memory my default installation was using, well over 1 GB. That seems a little excessive to me and quite a bit more than Vista filled with start up applications.
My copy of Vista was about 1.5Gb startup, I guess it varies on what flavour you had, I have Vista Ultimate on my old Laptop
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

zappaDPJ

Quote from: Gary on Mar 10, 2010, 10:28:25
My copy of Vista was about 1.5Gb startup, I guess it varies on what flavour you had, I have Vista Ultimate on my old Laptop

That's interesting because that's the version I'm using and even now while browsing and running a number of small apps it's sitting at 1.05GB. Perhaps it's dependent on hardware and drivers etc  :dunno:
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

That sounds like a challenge.  :evil:
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

zappaDPJ

 ;D

Sounds more like Microsoft performing as expected to me  :laugh:
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

D-Dan

Ubuntu  :whistle: Ubuntu  :whistle: Ubuntu  :whistle:
Have I lost my way?



This post doesn't necessarily represent even my own opinions, let alone anyone else's

Gary

Quote from: zappaDPJ on Mar 10, 2010, 11:56:56
That's interesting because that's the version I'm using and even now while browsing and running a number of small apps it's sitting at 1.05GB. Perhaps it's dependent on hardware and drivers etc  :dunno:
Mine had some other bits and bobs maybe to yours at startup and was a laptop, must admit its a dim memory since i got the Mac, and Windows 7 is so much nicer in many ways, although I prefer the OSX dock. I do wonder were Microsoft will go from here, Windows 8 would have to really pull something magic out of the hat.
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Simon

Quote from: D-Dan on Mar 10, 2010, 20:40:19
Ubuntu  :whistle: Ubuntu  :whistle: Ubuntu  :whistle:

Who are you calling a bunt?   ;D
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

D-Dan

Quote from: Simon on Mar 10, 2010, 22:34:49
Who are you calling a bunt?   ;D

I really can't be sure if that's genuinely funny, or a drop of amber nectar has lowered my standards.

I'll get back to you tomorrow, but in the meantime  :rofl3:

Steve
Have I lost my way?



This post doesn't necessarily represent even my own opinions, let alone anyone else's

Simon

My standards are pretty low, Steve.  ;D
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

With an avatar like that, what can you expect. ;D :out:
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Inkblot

Quote from: zappaDPJ on Mar 10, 2010, 10:03:19
So far I can't find much to criticise although I don't like the visual appearance of the launch bar. It uses a lot of space but is quite stark graphically, particularly on the right hand side.

I thought that as well but I changed mine back to the XP/Vista look with proper labels along the bottom on a single height taskbar rather than pictures on a dual height one, the other change is always make is icon size and position - I prefer them slightly smaller and close together so a few minutes tinkering and I now have something that resembles my old xp desktop :)

Simon

That avatar follows me everywhere, Rik.  ;D
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

 ;D

It's eyes follow me everywhere.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

zappaDPJ

Quote from: Inkblot on Mar 11, 2010, 08:01:42
I thought that as well but I changed mine back to the XP/Vista look with proper labels along the bottom on a single height taskbar rather than pictures on a dual height one, the other change is always make is icon size and position - I prefer them slightly smaller and close together so a few minutes tinkering and I now have something that resembles my old xp desktop :)

Now that sounds much better, I wasn't aware you could do so much customisation. I shall have a fiddle  :thumb: :karma:
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Inkblot

Quote from: zappaDPJ on Mar 11, 2010, 20:29:50
Now that sounds much better, I wasn't aware you could do so much customisation. I shall have a fiddle  :thumb: :karma:

Thanks :)

Taskbar is easy - right-click it and look at properties and then select the 'use small icons' checkbox and the 'Combine when taskbar is full' option for the 'taskbar buttons'. Don't think I did anything else but even if I did it's all in those menus!

Desktop icons are trickier to find but one way is to right-click the desktop and select 'personalize' (Bloody American spellings) and right at the bottom of the window are the settings for the current theme - 2nd button in is 'Window Color' (Another American spelling). Select this and then pick 'Icon Spacing (Horizontal)' or indeed any other setting to be able to play around with it - I go for 30 for both Horizontal and Vertical on the Icon spacing but then I do have fairly small icons to start with :)