What causes a CHAP time-out?

Started by Jimbo, Apr 06, 2010, 19:10:52

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Jimbo

Quote from: pdu on Apr 21, 2010, 02:19:25
Unfortunately, most so called surge protectors are pretty much a joke as they tend to rely on a component called a MOV, these have a finite life expectancy even with clean power, yet tend to die with either one large surge or a few smaller ones.  Naturally most 'surge protectors' are wired so as to continue supplying power to the outlets, in theory the light should fail, but it's not uncommon for a MOV to be alive enough to still power the indicator yet provide virtually no protection: wiki mov link.  Basically, if you care about the connected device, plug it into a high quality surge protector (these cost a wedge and aren't found in the likes of B&Q) or UPS, as the battery backup on these along with voltage sensors provide better protection, if you don't care about the device, save yourself £2 on the cost of a power strip.  For any serious danger level spikes, chances are the RCD protection in your consumer unit will kick it before you reach fire hazard levels.

On another note re the original post being about a draytek router, I'd recommend you get yourself another cheap router just to compare the difference, when I bought a 2820 it couldn't hold a connection beyond 24 hours either, after 3 days I plugged my trusty old d-link dsl504t - half covered in plaster - back in (visit your local museum to see one) and my disconnections stopped.  I returned the router for a refund and built my own with some cheapo PC hardware for about the same cost.  Basically from what I remember, it wasn't actually much better h/w than you get in any other half decent router, draytek just loads the software with lots of options and features it can't actually cope with.  After discovering this, I got a friend to remove his cable version of the draytek to see if it stopped him disconnecting from IRC about 45 minutes, a netgear off freecycle solves his stability issues too.

HTH

Sorry for the late reply. 

Just to update people, should be getting a spare Router from a chap at work, so will test that out shortly.

Still been having issues and to top it off, this weekend, I've suddenly lost half of my connection speed.  Down to 1148kbps.  Tried restarting once on Saturday and twice on Sunday and re-sync'd at exactly the same value.  I turned the Router off last night, just powered on now, and I have reconnected with the same results.

I have emailed Support again to see if they can manually do anything at their end, as I used to run 2.5Mb perfectly fine.  So I'm getting a bit fed up again now.  Disconnects every evening and now my internet is down to a crawl!

I want to buy the new-ish Netgear DGND3300, but at ~£100, it's just like "why should I have to pay out again, the DrayTek is nearly brand new still".

I did email DrayTek Support, but they have not come across this issue before.  :(

Cheers.

Rik

Draytek's can be quite bad for some lines, Jimbo. Ask IDNet if they have a router they could loan you. Sync speed is purely an issue between your router and the exchange, so there's not a lot IDNet can do.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Jimbo

Quote from: Rik on May 10, 2010, 17:31:29
...Sync speed is purely an issue between your router and the exchange, so there's not a lot IDNet can do.

Just thought that it's weird, that on 3... no 4 reboots now, it's gone back to the exact same figure.  I don't know if something is stuck?  Or if it's being forced?  :dunno:

Rik

DLM could be forcing it if the noise levels or the error count are high.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Jimbo

Quote from: Rik on May 10, 2010, 18:05:14
DLM could be forcing it if the noise levels or the error count are high.

Is that SNR?  My SNR value is 3... which I think is good?

RX CRC Errors is 1.

Loop Attenuation is 57.

Thanks.

Rik

An SNR of 3 could be bad, it depends on what it is just after resyncing. If it's the default of 6db, then you've got 3db of added noise on the line now. That error count is low, did you check for FEC errors?
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Jimbo

Quote from: Rik on May 10, 2010, 18:55:26
An SNR of 3 could be bad, it depends on what it is just after resyncing. If it's the default of 6db, then you've got 3db of added noise on the line now. That error count is low, did you check for FEC errors?

Hmm just telnet on to Router and my DS Interleave depth is 384.  I'm sure that used to be something like 32.  For comparison, my US Interleave depth is 8.  I wonder if that has something to do with this?

Just enabled dual-latency?  Not sure if that's good or bad, but will see if it makes a difference.  Going to do an "adsl reboot" now and see what happens.....

Jimbo

OK adsl reboot ran, connected at exactly the same speed.  :mad:

BUT.... SNR is now 6dB and Router reports that the DS Attainable Rate is 2222Kbps!  So why am I being "forced" to half this speed?  :dunno:

Steve

My two pence for what its worth. With regard to interleave depth I've not seen any figures for adsl2+ I think 64 was the max for adslmax.I can find no further information on www.kitz.co.uk. Why can you not get a higher sync? I think possibly your are on a banded profile 572-1152 i.e BT will not let your line sync any higher than this fullstop. Why is this imposed? It seems to be applied to lines which have an imperfect connection whether this be due to noise/interference,frequent retrains and lastly high error counts. It is possible to get this removed but the reasons behind its implementation have to be cured or alleviated first otherwise it will be reapplied.

Have you discussed with support re having your connection re modulated to adslmax , you should keep upstream sync benefit and of course adsl2+ bandwidth allowances.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

#34
Reed Solomon Octets make a figure of 384 theoretically possible. as interleave depth goes up 8,16,32,64

The interleave depth in this link is 224 so yours is possibly reported correctly
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/dslrouter/t/3722029-routers-known-to-work-well-with-infineonhuawei-msan.html
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

What Steve says, Jimbo, it sounds like a banded profile.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Jimbo

I don't understand.  It's been fine for ages, my only problem has been the WAN connection dropping each evening for weeks now.

Now all of a sudden I can't get my speed back on top, this is rubbish.  I'm paying a lot of money for a 1Mb service!  Support have said all they can do is disable interleaving, which doesn't help me.  They have suggested (again) to try another Router.

Steve/Rik, when you say "banded profile", so is that BT forcing me to down on the slower speed?  Who do I speak to, to get them to stop?  My line can happily do 2.5Mb and has done for months and months.

Steve, doubt I'll ever have low error counts or low noise, as I live in on the edge of the Exchange, in quite a leafy area.  So unless I pay £170 for an Engineer to come and check for any problems, I doubt anything will happen.

What would people suggest I ask support to do?  I want my normal speed/service back.  That's all I would like.  :(  :(  :(

I'm hoping to get a loan Router tomorrow also.  :fingers:


Rik

I've had a word with support, Jimbo. You are, indeed, banded at 576-1Mb. For a 57db line attenuation, that's way slower than my 59db line. However, it's pointless iDNet getting the banding lifted because your d/s noise margin is 5.7db, you'd actually stand to lose speed with banding removed.

Personally, I haven't had much success with Draytek routers and rate-adaptive ADSL. I would strongly urge you to try another router and see what happens to your noise margin. If that increases significantly, the unbanding becomes a workable option. Also, try plugging the router into the test socket if you have one.

If nothing helps, IDNet can have you modulated back to ADSL Max, and you will retain both the bandwidth allowance and upstream speed.

However, I should make the point that this is a local issue, between your router and the exchange. No ISP can control that, all they can do is get an engineer out if you're willing to risk the £170.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Jimbo

Quote from: Rik on May 11, 2010, 17:34:03
I've had a word with support, Jimbo. You are, indeed, banded at 576-1Mb. For a 57db line attenuation, that's way slower than my 59db line. However, it's pointless iDNet getting the banding lifted because your d/s noise margin is 5.7db, you'd actually stand to lose speed with banding removed.

Personally, I haven't had much success with Draytek routers and rate-adaptive ADSL. I would strongly urge you to try another router and see what happens to your noise margin. If that increases significantly, the unbanding becomes a workable option. Also, try plugging the router into the test socket if you have one.

If nothing helps, IDNet can have you modulated back to ADSL Max, and you will retain both the bandwidth allowance and upstream speed.

However, I should make the point that this is a local issue, between your router and the exchange. No ISP can control that, all they can do is get an engineer out if you're willing to risk the £170.

Thanks for the help again Rik.

What SNR am I aiming for with this test Router?  I always thought a lower value was better, but obviously not.  :blush:  If it increases, will it automatically sync higher, or like you say do I need to get in touch to have the unbanding applied?

Cheers.

Rik

When you're banded, BT limit the highest speed that you can connect at. Therefore, like old fixed-rate ADSL, the higher the noise margin the better. If you get another 3db, your sync speed could be increased by 500k etc. First check the noise margin, then consider whether unbanding is an option.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Jimbo

Quote from: Rik on May 11, 2010, 17:51:18
When you're banded, BT limit the highest speed that you can connect at. Therefore, like old fixed-rate ADSL, the higher the noise margin the better. If you get another 3db, your sync speed could be increased by 500k etc. First check the noise margin, then consider whether unbanding is an option.

OK thanks Rik.

Done some digging around about the Draytek 2710.  I've turned off QoS via Telnet and also set the max Rx/Tx rates to 100%, as by default they are only 80%.  :dunno:  Also, flashed the Router again with the same version firmware but different ADSL model number, as people have reported this has helped with regards to reporting CRC Errors correctly.  I wasn't the only one to report a low number (which I did recently in this topic) then to find an hour later I had 50 odd thousand errors.

So I've done another adsl reboot via Telnet, I've sync'd with a higher SNR margin (7dB) so I'll see what happens with this.  :fingers:

Like I say, will get the loan Router tomorrow hopefully from a friend as well.


Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Jimbo

Well, got my friends loan Belkin 7632 ADSL2+ Wireless G Router as a loan.  It's not the newest or greatest, but will do for testing.  I think it has a Broadcom chip also.

Stats, well, pretty much identical to before, except where the DrayTek reported tens of thousands of errors, the Belkin shows 0.   ;D



So far things seem more responsive, which is weird as I'm no faster.  Missing having all the extra features, such as Bandwidth Management and multiple SSIDs, but nevermind.

Not sure why I can't see the DS Attenuation value though???  Still only 5dB Noise Margin.  :'(

Jimbo

Noise Margin now reported as 16dB.  Is that better?  ???

Rik

In your situation, Jumbo, yes.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Jimbo

Quote from: Rik on May 16, 2010, 15:56:56
In your situation, Jumbo, yes.

Thanks Rik.

Just sent an email to Brian on Support asking if the Banding can be removed and "normal service" resumed, as the Noise Margin is still showing as 16dB.  :)

Jimbo

I think I just jinxed it....

05/17/2010  17:24:02 ADSL Media Down !

Can you ruddy believe it!  Sync'd back now, same banded speed, noise margin still good, increased to 17dB.

I thought it might of been related to my email but I don't even think IDNet support work that quick!!  ;D

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Jimbo

 :D 3Mb!  At last!  Cheers IDNet Support.

Came in to find the Router unable to connect, so gave it a reboot and that seems to have cured it.  Not sure if having the Banding removed has confused the Router, but at last I'm back to full speed ahead! 

For how long though.... we shall see!  :whistle:

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.