Will Idnet escape the clutches of The Digital Economy Act ?

Started by kinmel, Apr 23, 2010, 19:57:14

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

dujas

Adrian Kennard has two more opinion based articles on his blog about the Act, here and here.


Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

kinmel

Quote from: Rik on Apr 25, 2010, 10:13:42
OTOH, their service/communications provider customer, eg me, would be, presumably?

Yes, but under the ACT AAISP can simply ignore any letters regarding people to whom they are not an ISP, which is you !

How can they find you if the Act means every letter is ignored, especially once it gets silly and you resell to me and I resell to you and you resell to AAISP all at a notional 1p a month.

"Round and round" said Zebedee,"round and round"  :thumb:
Alan  ‹(•¿•)›

What is the date of the referendum for England to become an independent country ?

Rik

Papertrails, eh?

Actually, if the RevK is right, all we need do is set up a company in the Isle of Man, because the legislation only applies to the UK
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

dujas

End result the cost of Internet access in the UK goes up to cover the ISP's extra administrative burden in enforcing this Act. The copyright holders go back to the legal process of court orders, as any ISP if they want to be awkward, can easily side-step the legislation by quibbling over what the Act's definition of a subscriber means  >:(

zappaDPJ

I think you are right.

I've spent some time rereading the act and I still maintain that without a court order it's all smoke and mirrors. There does however appear to be some provision within the Act, or rather an amendment to the Communications Act, that implies a disclosure can be demanded without the need for a court order, that can't possibly be right can it?

The parts that pertains to a graduated response scheme are just a big :lol: How on earth can it be constitutionally correct to require ISPs to act as judge and jury on file sharing? Send me a letter telling my I've downloaded data subject to copyright law illegally and I'll see you in court. I'll be the one applying for disclosure and anything else I think I can get out of it. It's a potential minefield for ISPs.
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Quote from: zappaDPJ on Apr 25, 2010, 16:22:31
I've spent some time rereading the act and I still maintain that without a court order it's all smoke and mirrors.

That's how Mandy works, of course.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pdu

I still find it utterly hilarious how a crook who isn't an MP because no moron in their right mind would vote for him at a local election can be given the power to decide over the digital fate of many.

Rik

I wish it was hilarious, but Mandy's appointment is about the most damaging thing to happen to democracy in my lifetime. :(
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

Quote from: Rik on Apr 25, 2010, 17:19:10
I wish it was hilarious, but Mandy's appointment is about the most damaging thing to happen to democracy in my lifetime. :(
He may be gone soon, but I bet he defects to whoever wins by having one over on any leader at any time, he is a dangerous man.
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Rik

Very, Gary. He not only knows where the bodies are buried, he often helped to bury them.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pdu

You mean other than Alan Sugar? I can't believe they had the balls to use the title Tsar, I knew Brown was a communist lowlife, but that was just taking the biscuit!

Gary

Quote from: Rik on Apr 25, 2010, 17:30:07
Very, Gary. He not only knows where the bodies are buried, he often helped to bury them.
He reminds me of a slimy Francis Urquhart character, but without the sincere evil that character possessed
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Rik

No, I grant you that, he's totally insincere, but just as evil.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Quote from: pdu on Apr 25, 2010, 17:30:32
You mean other than Alan Sugar? I can't believe they had the balls to use the title Tsar, I knew Brown was a communist lowlife, but that was just taking the biscuit!

They do like that title, don't they. :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

Quote from: Rik on Apr 25, 2010, 17:33:55
No, I grant you that, he's totally insincere, but just as evil.
True re-thinking that show made me think yup he is that evil  ;D
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

Quote from: pdu on Apr 25, 2010, 17:30:32
You mean other than Alan Sugar? I can't believe they had the balls to use the title Tsar, I knew Brown was a communist lowlife, but that was just taking the biscuit!
Brown is as far removed from Communism as he is from real life.
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Gary

Quote from: Rik on Apr 25, 2010, 17:38:44
Though you could, sneakily, like Urquhart.
Thats true, there was something to admire about his manner and the way he orchestrated his deeds, I loved that programme...
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Rik

Quote from: Gary on Apr 25, 2010, 17:39:24
Brown is as far removed from Communism as he is from real life.

:music: Ground Control to Major Tom
Your circuit's dead, there's something wrong :music: ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Quote from: Gary on Apr 25, 2010, 17:40:22
Thats true, there was something to admire about his manner and the way he orchestrated his deeds, I loved that programme...

It was brilliant, wasn't it.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Gary

Quote from: Rik on Apr 25, 2010, 17:42:03
It was brilliant, wasn't it.
Indeed it was Rik, although I fear Mandy has watched it too
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

zappaDPJ

Quote from: pdu on Apr 25, 2010, 17:30:32
You mean other than Alan Sugar? I can't believe they had the balls to use the title Tsar, I knew Brown was a communist lowlife, but that was just taking the biscuit!

I suppose they felt 'Tsar' had more of a ring to it than than 'Obnoxious East End Barrow Boy Purveyor of Tat'  :dunno:
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.