IDNet and latency

Started by kelevra, Jun 03, 2010, 10:07:08

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Glenn

Is interleaving turned on?

:karma: :welc:
Glenn
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

DorsetBoy

 :welcome:  It may be interleaving is on, can you get the adsl stats from your router,you'll need to telnet for them?

Ray

Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Welcome to the forum, Fozy (can I put an 'n' in that, please ;)). :welc: :karma:

BT seem to have been having a bad hair day. Have you spoken to support. If not, I can take up your case in the morning.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

fozy994

I sent them an email with tracerts and what not because the offices were closed, if you can do anything to speed it along I'd love it!

Rik

I can't do anything to shift it until tomorrow, I'm afraid, but I'll have a word with support in the morning if you want me to.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

fozy994

Yea if you could please, you are a god!

Rik

Flattery will get you everywhere. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Quote from: fozy994 on Jun 08, 2010, 19:22:15
I sent them an email with tracerts and what not because the offices were closed, if you can do anything to speed it along I'd love it!

Support have requested interleaving be turned off, so retest tomorrow when it will be off, ideally, do so with a cabled connection, with wireless turned off in the router and with the computer running in safe mode with networking support. If all is well, try again in 'full' Winodws mode, if that's OK, turn wireless back on. Your router is apparently off at the moment, it would be better if you ran it 24/7.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

fozy994

Ok thanks will give it a shot, yea thats the eco power saving mother who switches every switch off given half the chance  :mad:


Steve

Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

fozy994


Rik

 ;D

We're way more subtle than that, Fozy. ;)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

fozy994

Popping home from work at lunch so I will check my latencys out  :fingers:


Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

fozy994


Rik

Can you do a series of manual pings (ping <server> -t -n 20) to www.idnet.net and any servers you use frequently.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

kelevra

Would BT have put a new profile on the line?

If interleaving has actually been turned off surely the ping should have lowered at least a little.

Rik

That's why I asked for some tests that I can talk to support about. Interleaving may have been turned off, but something may have triggered it to turn back on again.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

kelevra

Mine should have been changed as well so i will check when home and update here with results.

fozy994

Ok this is my tracert (i sent ping last time)

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>tracert www.bbc.co.uk

Tracing route to www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.246.159]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  . [192.168.2.1]
  2    31 ms    31 ms    32 ms  telehouse-gw4-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.99]
  3    32 ms    31 ms    32 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [212.69.63.243]

  4    32 ms    32 ms    31 ms  rt-lonap-a.thdo.bbc.co.uk [193.203.5.90]
  5    31 ms    32 ms    32 ms  212.58.238.129
  6    33 ms    33 ms    32 ms  te12-1.hsw0.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk [212.58.239.222]
  7    39 ms    36 ms    32 ms  212.58.255.12
  8    33 ms    33 ms    32 ms  fmt-vip02.cwwtf.bbc.co.uk [212.58.246.159]



PINGS

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>
C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping www.idnet.net -t -n 20

Pinging www.idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 30ms









Rik

That looks about average for an interleaved line, let me see what I can find out for you.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

kelevra

Unfortunately mine seems none the better :(

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=59

Tracing route to www-tmmdi.l.google.com [66.102.9.147]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

 1     4 ms     2 ms     2 ms  192.168.2.1
 2    34 ms    33 ms    36 ms  telehouse-gw4-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.
 3    33 ms    31 ms    32 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [21

 4    40 ms    32 ms    30 ms  195.66.224.125
 5    37 ms    32 ms    33 ms  64.233.175.27
 6    57 ms    49 ms    54 ms  209.85.250.216
 7    50 ms    55 ms    46 ms  72.14.232.235
 8    63 ms    56 ms    49 ms  64.233.174.14
 9    46 ms    50 ms    50 ms  lm-in-f147.1e100.net [66.102.9.147]