Xp Home or XP Pro?

Started by cavillas, Apr 03, 2007, 13:47:32

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

cavillas

I have a query.  I can use either XP Home or XP Pro. At the moment I have XP Pro installed and am quite happy with it.  Does anyone know whether XP Home is faster than XP Pro and/or any benefits of one over the other.  I have checked on numerous sites concerning this but there is no definitive answer and I was wondering if the combined knowledge and experience of Idnetters have any idea. :-*
------
Alf :)

Lance

I don't know about speed differences but I would expect them to be minimal.

If you are an advanced user you won't be able to live without the "advanced" features in XP Pro, else you will find Home does the job.

I would suggest that if you are happy running XP Pro at the moment, that you save yourself the bother and stick with it.
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

I second that, Lance. Pro would definitely be my choice and I have never noticed a speed difference between Pro and Home.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

AvengerUK

Home and pro have very slight differences - Pro has more functionaility - so id stick with that :)

cavillas

Many thanks for all your help.  I think I will stick with Pro. Now should I use Visual Studio 2003 Enterprise or Visual Studio 2005? Ar'nt I a pest. ::) ;D
------
Alf :)

Rik

On that one, I'll have to pass, Cav.  :(
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

cavillas

The only reason is that my son has given me both and I would like to do some programming for my pocket PC with pocket windows 2003.  It was  Navman pin 512 from Morgancomputers at £98, what a bargain and they still have some left -- no this is not an advert just a bit of info.  ::) ;D
------
Alf :)

Lance

I would be inclined to go with 2005, cavillas. This is because, with each release Microsoft have brought improvements to the developing environment and in some cases, improvements to the actual coding itself. But it depends on which you find easier to use - why not try one and then the other for a while to get a feel for both. After all, the code itself should be pretty much transferable between the two.

Lance
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

RobMc

yep, vs 2005 would be my choice. I've done pocketPC development using vb.net 2005 and it's so much easier to develop and deploy than 2003. Unless there is some real pressing need to use vs 2003, I'd go with vs 2005.

By the way the three most noticeable differences between XP home and Pro are as follows:

Only Simple File Sharing is available in XP Home
IIS is not included with XP Home
An XP Home PC can't join a Domain

To be honest non of these are show stoppers unless you are in a business environment.

Rob.