Anyone use PGP?

Started by pctech, Oct 25, 2010, 18:25:16

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

pctech

As part of prep to start my own business I'm thinking of using PGP to sign my mail to ensure security between myself and my customers.

Looked at both Open PGP and the PGP product produced by PGP Corporation but not sure which to use.

Any suggestions?


Rik

I haven't tried either, Mitch, toyed with them but never got around to it. I did use a certificate from Comodo for a while, and digitally sign from within Outlook, which worked well.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pctech

I'm planning to offer domain registration as part of my services and Nominet require the use of PGP to sign the instructions sent to their automated system.


Rik

Ah. Sorry, can't help then.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pctech

NP thanks for the response though.

I should probably buy PGP desktop.


Rik

It would be a safe bet, I think.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

DorsetBoy

You couldn't make this up....

I just looked up PGP as I had no clue who they are, this is what I got  :red: 



Click for full size.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pctech

Probably because you are using Opera.

No problem with FF.


nowster

Quote from: pctech on Oct 25, 2010, 18:25:16Looked at both Open PGP and the PGP product produced by PGP Corporation but not sure which to use.
GNU Privacy Guard is good enough for several thousand Debian developers. http://www.gnupg.org/

pctech

Cheers, that'll save me some dough as PGP want 150 quid for desktop and are now owned by Symantec (groan)


Rik

One good reason to avoid them. I wonder how much they are paying Nominet for the rule? ;)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pctech

 ;D

I maybe wrong but isn't PGP supposed to be the strongest form of encryption publicly available without charge?


Rik

I think so, but not if Norton has anything to do with it. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pctech

Long before I even cared about computers but I understand the original Peter Norton tools were supposed to be good.

Rik

They were, Mitch, most people of my age will have used them.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

nowster

Quote from: Rik on Oct 26, 2010, 15:55:44
One good reason to avoid them. I wonder how much they are paying Nominet for the rule? ;)
PGP used to be free (of charge). Nominet themselves probably use GPG (ie. OpenPGP) on their mail responders anyway.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.