FTTC now available, want to move from SKY, few questions....

Started by shorn, Jan 15, 2011, 19:16:28

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rik

Probably. Any changes in exchange loading seem to be magnified by fibre.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

.Griff.

Quote from: shorn on Jan 24, 2011, 17:00:36
Presumably the drop in speed is going to be down to the time of day.

Not to that extent. Tried another location? What does Maidstone or Milton Keynes give you?

For example -



Compared with -


Anton

Quote from: shorn on Jan 24, 2011, 16:55:35

I have a feeling that the apps may just not been that good at reading the speed.


I'm pretty sure you're right - I've never had what I feel is an accurate answer out of an iPhone bandwidth application.

Don't get too hung up on this for now - as others have pointed out you're testing a whole chain of IP connections and pipes, and the result you get will only ever be as good as the slowest point (hence Sittingbourne versus Milton Keynes).

Why not watch a few movie trailers on Apple TV and feel the speed ;-)

I hardly ever test anymore, as the speed is now always more than "adequate" to stream some HD, do some downloading and surf too without everything slowing to a jittery crawl.

That said, I'd strongly suggest using istumbler:

http://www.istumbler.net/

to check out what's around you and move to a nice non-congested area of the 2.4 band. That should tidy up your iPhone connnection I hope.
Anton
FTTC - Airport Extreme (Dual Band) - Various Macs and Apple TVs!

Bill

Quote from: shorn on Jan 24, 2011, 14:30:11Its just that there is still a bit difference between 25 and 35 down!

My experience of FTTC is that a speed variation like that is nothing unusual, it seems to be much more sensitive to congestion.

I've also got doubts about the tbb speedtester on FTTC, it usually gives me results that are well down from the "real life" speeds, eg from iTunes. The Broadband Quality meter is very useful though, albeit occasionally frightening :P
Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

.Griff.

Just to echo what Bill said about the speedtester on Thinkbroadband.. Namely the fact it's absolutely useless.

All other testers reflect real world experiences but TBB speedtester is wildly inaccurate in my experience and it's a shame they refuse to acknowledge it's less than perfect.

Bill

Quote from: .Griff. on Jan 24, 2011, 18:32:00it's a shame they refuse to acknowledge it's less than perfect.

To be fair, I don't think it's the speedtester itself... when I first got FTTC it was fine, then it gradually tailed off. When BT "deleted" IDNet from the system it was fine again for a few days then slowed down, same happened when they repeated the the performance, same again when one of IDNet's core routers (?) fell over, and on other odd occasions when there's been some sort of "event" on the 'net that would affect routing.

I'm as convinced as I can be that BT do something different to data coming in via FTTC...
Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

Rik

It all comes to Milton Keynes, where they employ an army of otherwise unemployable geeks to randomly select bytes to discard, Bill.  ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Glenn

Glenn
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

.Griff.

I've spoken to both Seb and Andrew in the past with an idea to find out what the issue was/is but their simple response was "it's fine.. Must be your fault" rather than accept there's some issue with IDNet/FTTC and the test.

Bill

Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

Rik

Quote from: Glenn on Jan 24, 2011, 18:49:23
So that's what you do all day?  :out:

:nana: ;D

Actually, I didn't like to own up for fear of being lynched. ;)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Bill

Quote from: .Griff. on Jan 24, 2011, 18:50:21
I've spoken to both Seb and Andrew in the past with an idea to find out what the issue was/is but their simple response was "it's fine.. Must be your fault" rather than accept there's some issue with IDNet/FTTC and the test.

Yeah, I've noticed >:(

Not many on FTTC yet though, hopefully if/when they get enough complaints they'll have to look into it
Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

Rik

So some time in the next decade then, to judge by BT's progress to date. ;)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Bill

Probably :(

But if it is BT messing about, tbb likely won't be able to do much about it... which would be a pity, 'cos basically it's a good tester.
Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

shorn

As has been mentioned, I think I'm not going to worry to much about speed tests. In real world uses it seems great. I just bought the complete Alan Partridge off iTunes. I think there was about 6.7Gb worth in total. Started it off, watched a 40 minute episode of the US Office, and by the time it was finished the download was done! Thats amazing! That would have normally taken about 10 hours!!

Bill

Sounds about right ;D

Provided I don't get stuck with a badly congested link, I usually reckon about 5-6 minutes/GB.

It's one of the potential problems with fibre- it makes it far too easy to spend money with iTunes :P
Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

Anton

Quote from: Bill on Jan 24, 2011, 20:16:52
It's one of the potential problems with fibre- it makes it far too easy to spend money with iTunes :P

And indeed urinate your data cap up the wall at an alarming rate... ;-)

I have found though, 4 months in, that data usage passes through an alarming bump and then settles down once the red mist of connection has worn off!
Anton
FTTC - Airport Extreme (Dual Band) - Various Macs and Apple TVs!

Bill

Quote from: Anton on Jan 24, 2011, 21:20:29
And indeed urinate your data cap up the wall at an alarming rate... ;-)

Yup- given a link that allowed me to max out the line, I could go through a month's (peak hours) usage allowance in a little under 2 hours :eek4:
Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

shorn

OK well its been 8 days now since it was installed. So it's getting close to the recommended 10 days for the speed to settle. I'm getting around 20mb down and 8 up.



This is about the best I can get from the Speedtest site. (And this is the best from all the servers.)

I would have to say that I'm a tad disappointed that its not really close to the minimum 27mb down that was predicted. Don't get me wrong, the extra speed is great over the 1.5mb I was getting, however I am paying over £25 more a month than I was before!

I also find that I am getting some sites that load quite slowly. Most sites are fine, things like the BBC news site is up in no time, however sites like MacRumours seem to load 90% then hang for 5 seconds or so (where I get the beachball and cannot use it), and then finish loading.

I'm pleased, but not quite as stoked as I thought I would be.


Bill

Quote from: shorn on Feb 01, 2011, 21:15:57
I also find that I am getting some sites that load quite slowly. Most sites are fine, things like the BBC news site is up in no time, however sites like MacRumours seem to load 90% then hang for 5 seconds or so (where I get the beachball and cannot use it), and then finish loading.
Can be an MTU problem... make sure it's set to at least 8 less on the computer than on the router, eg 1492/1500.

PPPoE overhead.
Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

shorn

Last Few....


Date         Time                  Down        Up     Latencey
1/24/2011 9:23 AM   GMT   25.07           7.76   20   Sittingbourne   0
1/24/2011 9:25 AM   GMT   23.22           7.85   20   Sittingbourne   0
1/24/2011 9:35 AM   GMT   30.11    7.83   20   Sittingbourne   0
1/24/2011 11:00 AM   GMT   32.5           7.87   23   Sittingbourne   0
1/24/2011 11:14 AM   GMT   32.49           7.87   21   Sittingbourne   0
1/24/2011 2:28 PM   GMT   25.71           7.85   21   Sittingbourne   0
1/24/2011 4:58 PM   GMT   11.01           7.91   21   Sittingbourne   0
1/24/2011 5:54 PM   GMT   18.33           5.13   20   Sittingbourne   0
1/24/2011 5:55 PM   GMT   4.59           1.23   421   Newbury           100
1/29/2011 11:44 PM   GMT   19.03           7.17   21   Sittingbourne   0
1/29/2011 11:45 PM   GMT   24.32           6.85   40   London           50
1/29/2011 11:45 PM   GMT   21.69           7.22   28   Aubervilliers   200
1/29/2011 11:46 PM   GMT   24.53           7.36   22   Ashford           50
02/01/2011 21:07           GMT   20.75     7.35   42   Maidstone           50
02/01/2011 21:07           GMT   15.28           4.98   21   Sittingbourne   0
02/01/2011 21:10           GMT   21.88           7.96   31   Coventry           100

.Griff.

The Sittingbourne server gives me awful results as well but I see you've tried Maidstone once and that generally gives me the most accurate results.

What result do you get from this ? - http://www.mybroadbandspeed.co.uk/

That has always been reliable for me.


Anton

How have things panned out Shorn? Has the rate recovered any?
Anton
FTTC - Airport Extreme (Dual Band) - Various Macs and Apple TVs!

pctech

Quote from: .Griff. on Jan 24, 2011, 18:50:21
I've spoken to both Seb and Andrew in the past with an idea to find out what the issue was/is but their simple response was "it's fine.. Must be your fault" rather than accept there's some issue with IDNet/FTTC and the test.

They aren't BT employees are thay?