PS3 import ban

Started by Steve, Mar 01, 2011, 14:42:05

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Steve

Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Technical Ben

#1
Not really. The same happened with the rumble controller in the PS2. Every other games console either paid royalties for the existing tech, or designed their own (there is more than one way to make something shake). Sony however never did. So about 2-3 years after the release they had to pay massive royalties back dated, after a court battle. Sony themselves have patents on hardware and software, and would not want someone to copy\steal it from them. So they should not act that way towards their competitors.

No idea if the patents are solid, or based of diagrams of faeries though.
[edit]
Also, why on earth is the BBC using a "concept" image of the PS3 when that is not even the version they ever realised? Bad reporting me thinks.
The rest of the story is true though. Mainly "tit for tat" when it comes to patents.  :shake:
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

esh

Patents are just ammo for when you have some grudge you want to itch at, or when profit margins didn't quite work out. If all the patent violations collected in the mobile and CPU markets were unleashed, it would be mutually assured destruction.
CompuServe 28.8k/33.6k 1994-1998, BT 56k 1998-2001, NTL Cable 512k 2001-2004, 2x F2S 1M 2004-2008, IDNet 8M 2008 - LLU 11M 2011

Technical Ben

They already are in the Mobile industry. :P
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.