BT Speedtester Lite Beta

Started by .Griff., Sep 10, 2011, 15:33:37

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

.Griff.


Rik

I'm curious why they're introducing it, Griff. As you say, it gives no really useful information, and, for that matter, gave me a throughout above my profile.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

zappaDPJ

I like it, it gives me a 39.63 Mbps download speed ::)
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

I reckon BT are going to use it to 'prove' they've increased throughput. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Baz

saw that earlier but wasnt sure whether to try it as theres some warning about BT not been responsible if it causes any damage  ::)


:laugh:

sat_mad

At least it doesn't require Java to use.

FritzBox

A BT Speedtester that actually works for me. Brilliant

Technical Ben

So it's a standard download tester, without the bells and whistles the normal BT profile system has?
A broken speedtest.net then?  :slap:
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

Rik

No, it's not broken, Ben, just useless. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pctech

I suspect they'll ask you to type in your number when it comes out of beta as even though its 2011 BT can't do things by IP address it would seem (and yes I know the IP is allocated by the ISP) but they should be able to communicate with the ISP's systems to determine which connection the source IP is allocated to.


Technical Ben

You trust them with that information!?  :laugh:  :o
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

pctech

Not really but its a bit backward that they don't do it now.



Polchraine

It is fast and simple ...

It could be there as a quick one off test and see if the results are "sensible" - if not then a full speedtest is needed.   No bells, no whistles, no fancy graphics, login, server selection, advertising &c just fast and simple.



I'm desperately trying to figure out why kamikaze pilots wore helmets.

pctech

I do wish they'd sort out the servers that power the full BT test though, they do take ages to do lookups.


Rik

I suspect the problem is less with the test servers and more with the verification, Mitch.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pctech

I think you are bang on there Rik.

Any ISP I've spoken to moans about the speed on their side too,

Rik

BT hand out resources with all the good grace of an Army quartermaster. ;)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Technical Ben

Does the original actually get data from the exchange? I would guess it's a rather basic system for diagnostics. Your not going to install expensive hardware to ping an exchange or get a status request at any rate. But while slow can be forgive, broken is not! :D
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

Lance

The existing BT speedtest must get some details from the exchange, such as sync speed.
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

talos

Works for me :)
                           The usual BT tester dont

pctech

I gather the existing one reads data from the BRAS.