Chrome hacked in five minutes

Started by Simon, Mar 08, 2012, 21:52:50

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Simon

Google's browser was hacked within only five minutes as part of annual security contest.

Pwn2Own is an annual browser hacking contest held at CanSecWest in Vancouver. This year, following a disagreement with contest organisers Tipping Point over vulnerability disclosures, Google held its own competition at the same conference, offering a total of $1 million in potential prize money.

After avoiding being successfully attacked for three years thanks largely to its sandbox, which locks down executable code to prevent damage, Chrome was hacked at both Pwn2Own and Google's Pwnium.

For the former, Vupen Security's team used a pair of zero-day flaws - one targeting Windows, the other targeting Chrome's sandbox - to hack the browser mere minutes into the start of the contest.

While the hack only took five minutes to execute, Vupen has been developing the attack against Chrome's sandbox for six weeks, Bekrar told ZDNet.

Read more: http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/security/373426/chrome-hacked-in-five-minutes
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Don't know which OS Chrome was on but certainly IE and Safari were on old OSs, however since they all been hacked I can use which I choose. ;)
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Technical Ben

Yep. With a big enough hammer, every lock looks like a nail...

Wait a sec...  :dunno:
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

Niall

So basically this article is purely designed to make you read it, based on the fact it took 5 minutes to hack, which technically isn't true as it took 6 weeks to develop the method to allow the 5 minute attack. I hate journalism like this  :no:
Flickr Deviant art
Art is not a handicraft, it is the transmission of feeling the artist has experienced.
Leo Tolstoy

gizmo71

Quote from: Niall on Mar 08, 2012, 23:31:56
So basically this article is purely designed to make you read it, based on the fact it took 5 minutes to hack, which technically isn't true as it took 6 weeks to develop the method to allow the 5 minute attack. I hate journalism like this  :no:

That part of it seems like a reasonable statement; imagine a car thief who spends six weeks developing a technique for stealing a particular type of car. Is that six weeks of interest, or would owners of that car be more interested in how many minutes it takes to steal their individual car? :eyebrow:
SimRacing.org.uk Director General | Team Shark Online Racing - on the podium since 1993
Up the Mariners!

Technical Ben

Yep. We have seen it too. Cars recalled because the key/RF lock is no good and can be hacked. I hear the likes of David Beckam lost a few that way.  :laugh:

I think the reason people treat the browsers differently on security, is because the companies do. Microsoft were known to be either too naive ("no one would try to hack a browser, right?") or not putting enough effort into security ("We will allow our plugins to have full OS control").
Where as Apple, Google and Mozilla seem to think more about security and their customers than their bottom line (well, with the exception of Apple and Google, who at least think of both ;) ).
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

TheMonkey

Quote from: Niall on Mar 08, 2012, 23:31:56
So basically this article is purely designed to make you read it, based on the fact it took 5 minutes to hack, which technically isn't true as it took 6 weeks to develop the method to allow the 5 minute attack. I hate journalism like this  :no:

I agree. The last event Safari was hacked which again, had been worked on for a few weeks by the hacker and also patched by Apple but the event was able to use the unpatched version.

Pointless really.
Vrooooooooooom........oh wait. Whats happened?