Apple reveals thinnest iPad yet

Started by Simon, Oct 16, 2014, 19:27:09

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Simon

Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Technical Ben

Personally I'd prefer lighter over thinner. It's a silly thing when you play the numbers game for numbers sake. "Biggest" or "smallest". Where as at least "faster" has some productivity returns. :)
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

Steve

It is lighter lets hope it doesn't bend >:D I await with interest I'm not a fan of iOS 8 on my current iPad with retina display so I will need to be convinced.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

zappaDPJ

I'm more interested in the iMac with the 5210 x 2880 display. That's something I'd really like to see.
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Bill

Yes, that is rather tasty... not bad at 2 grand.
Bill
BQMs-  IPv4  IPv6

Technical Ben

Quote from: zappaDPJ on Oct 16, 2014, 19:47:44
I'm more interested in the iMac with the 5210 x 2880 display. That's something I'd really like to see.

That's it. It's over. I think seeing that many pixels would melt me!  :swoon:
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

talos


Gary

Quote from: talos on Oct 17, 2014, 07:11:31
Thin = bendy  :thumbd:
Considering the iPad is almost all battery I would imagine its harder to bend than a rectangle with a battery on one side. I'm going to order one when ever they go on sale and see what they are like.
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Technical Ben

Batteries that thin can be bendy...

If the build quality is there, then it's great. The proof of the pudding is in the eating!  :)x
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.