Sllloooowww...

Simon · Aug 27, 2007, 17:14:50

Is is me, or is it like wading through treacle here this afternoon? I'm getting up to a 30 second delay when posting messages. $:-\$

Rik · Aug 27, 2007, 17:23:32

No, it's not just you - I was about to post the same question.

Anyone else? I'm registering 13-30 second delays.

Simon · Aug 27, 2007, 17:35:24

Perhaps it's giving us a hint to go out and ...

Rik · Aug 27, 2007, 17:37:07

A distinct possibility.

cavillas · Aug 27, 2007, 17:52:11

I wanta new life, everything is getting slower.

J!ll · Aug 27, 2007, 17:56:15

Slowwwwwwww here too

Rik · Aug 27, 2007, 18:00:09

Quote from: cavillas on Aug 27, 2007, 17:52:11
I wanta new life, everything is getting slower.

Get in the queue, Alf.

Rik · Aug 27, 2007, 18:00:33

Quote from: J!ll on Aug 27, 2007, 17:56:15
Slowwwwwwww here too

Thanks, Jill.

cavillas · Aug 27, 2007, 19:27:44

Getting faster now.

Simon · Aug 27, 2007, 19:50:21

Yes, better now. Must have been caught in a bottleneck.

J!ll · Aug 28, 2007, 22:16:42

slow again

Lance · Aug 29, 2007, 00:16:29

I'm finding it slow too!

Rik, you better run the same things as before!

Simon · Aug 29, 2007, 00:49:57

Seems OK now, but I'm the only one here.

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 08:34:36

Seems OK this morning, anyone having a problem?

Lance · Aug 29, 2007, 08:37:48

Seems ok to me too now.

Simon · Aug 29, 2007, 09:08:08

Fine here too.

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 09:09:29

I must have kicked the tyres hard enough to scare it.

RobMc · Aug 29, 2007, 10:16:25

hmmm just looked at this thread and accoring to the note at the bottom of the page:

Page created in 3.292 seconds with 21 queries.

Which seems a long time to me. It also implies a server load issue rather than a bandwidth issue.

hth

Rob.

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 10:30:09

1.52 seconds with 21 queries for me, Rob.

Inactive · Aug 29, 2007, 10:32:25

" Page created in 1.236 seconds with 19 queries. "

Lance · Aug 29, 2007, 10:35:31

Page created in 1.141 seconds with 19 queries.

Damn server!

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 10:35:50

.808/20 then 4.081/21.

J!ll · Aug 29, 2007, 10:37:03

Page created in 2.152 seconds with 22 queries.

Lance · Aug 29, 2007, 10:39:25

It's getting worse! 3.104 secs this time!

J!ll · Aug 29, 2007, 10:42:37

1.115 better

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 10:45:57

You sound like a Direct Line ad, Jill. 0.713...

J!ll · Aug 29, 2007, 11:05:24

Simon · Aug 29, 2007, 11:29:05

Page created in 0.889 seconds with 25 queries.

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 11:30:12

1.818/20.

I've asked Simon if there's anything he can do. That's the other Simon, of course.

Simon · Aug 29, 2007, 12:41:45

You'll have to excuse my ignorance on this, but does IDNet share a server with anyone else (and do ISPs in general do this)?

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 12:46:03

IDNet provide hosting for a number of prestigious companies and us.

Lance · Aug 29, 2007, 13:42:54

That does seem to be a ever-growing list!

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 13:54:00

Mmm, nice isn't it.

Simon · Aug 29, 2007, 13:54:32

Well, maybe things are reaching a capacity? Oh God, I hope this isn't a bad sign!

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 13:57:22

I don't think so, Simon checked the server when I contacted him earlier and all was OK. He was going to take a look at the logs for Monday and see if anything showed there. If it needs more hardware, I'm sure it will get it.

MoHux · Aug 29, 2007, 16:07:10

Page created in 0.906 seconds with 24 queries.

Mo

Rik · Aug 29, 2007, 16:10:42

Thanks, Mo. It seems that Monday was an isolated issue.

Simon · Aug 29, 2007, 19:39:15

There are definite peaks and troughs, presumably according to the load on the server at the time.

Page created in 1.977 seconds with 23 queries.

J!ll · Aug 29, 2007, 22:27:57

Page created in 0.741 seconds with 19 queries.