Re: Pings

Started by equk, Sep 28, 2006, 17:06:10

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

maxping

Have you told CS ?

TimJ

Quote from: maxping on Oct 10, 2006, 00:15:26
Have you told CS ?

Yes.

Spent 1/2 hour on phone to Miriam on Friday trying various tests. IDnet sent out a different router to try and I spend another 1/2 hour with Miriam on Monday.

What baffles me me is that I have 2 lines on different exchanges and both are seriously effected, how come there aren't many others effected. The quietness on this thread indicates that I am very much in the minority. It does not add up.

I am happy to spend a resonably amount of time helping IDnet sort out this problem, they are certainly trying their utmost,  but I suspect that it is a BT problem that they are going to be unable to resolve in the short/medium term and from my perspective a quick and simple migration will fix my problems :'(

Tim.



CatMangler

No Tim your are not alone, I have recently started experiencing the poor ping and connection problems (again).

Things seemed to have improved for about a week then for the last few days pings are all over the place with re-sync's and this morning no connection to idnet at all(local exchange synced @ 8Mb).

Had to leave router off for 10mins to restore connectivity to idnet.


maxping

I also had higher ping tonight than i have had for a while , not into the hundreds but between 40ms & 80ms.

I tried the  speedtest@speedtest_domain and it did the trick  ;)

maxping

#79
A couple of users are having ping issues during the day, as i do not work from home i don't often get chance to test my connection during the day.

I am off work today and for me it seems to make no difference if its day or night time my connection seems to have settled down over the last few Weeks.

I'm not posting this to  trivialise  the problems some people are having   but i think its fair to post good pings to show prospective customers its not all doom and gloom.

Pinging www.idnet.net with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:28ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:28ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:29ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:30ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:38ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:26ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:28ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:28ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:28ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:26ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:28ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:28ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:28ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:26ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:29ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:27ms TTL:60
Reply from 212.69.36.10 bytes:32 Time:28ms TTL:60
Ping statistics for www.idnet.net :
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0%) loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 26ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 28ms



merkin51

My ping since last night has been 130+, just in time for the BF2142 demo :( I'll give IDNet the benefit of the doubt that they'll sort this out asap, but it's pretty annoying.

Pinging www.idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=143ms TTL=60
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=60

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 134ms, Maximum = 143ms, Average = 138ms

mrapoc

damn pings 100+ on css atm, friends in the same area getting 20-30

maxping

OK here, have you tried the speedtest trick ?


Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0%) loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 28ms, Maximum = 54ms, Average = 33ms

equk

What happened to the original ping thread with the idnet announcements etc on it  ???

Just curious
Only back from having loads of people pm'd me about connections etc. Some interesting info from certain peeps.
e6400 @ 3.2Ghz 38°C 45°C | ATI X1900XT | P5W DH | ss: linux | osx
migration complete - sync 5mb 500k - stable low ping times

maxping

#84
Quote
What happened to the original ping thread with the idnet announcements etc on it  ???

I guess as most of the users here are now having no problems with their pings and the 2  that posted the most about their bad pings (you and Avenger) have moved on to new ISP's someone decided it was no longer relevant.


QuoteJust curious
Only back from having loads of people pm'd me about connections etc. Some interesting info from certain peeps.

I'm glad you have shared that with us , when i left freedom2surf i was so glad to get away i never visited the forums there again ,  i wonder what your motive is for coming here and posting this.

equk

#85
Post Deleted - By: [maxping], Reason: [Unknown. // Cleaning up previous post deleted message to be more friendly (Adam)]
e6400 @ 3.2Ghz 38°C 45°C | ATI X1900XT | P5W DH | ss: linux | osx
migration complete - sync 5mb 500k - stable low ping times

equk

What stirring?

I posted a link to the original thread and quoted Jeffs post.
(if you're not hiding anything, what's wrong with linking the original thread for new people to read thru?)

Got that deleted aswell as my other post in reply to yours stating I came back due to having emails saying I had pm's here and also that there are some ok peeps here.

Also you're that childish that you put my karma to -9  ::)
e6400 @ 3.2Ghz 38°C 45°C | ATI X1900XT | P5W DH | ss: linux | osx
migration complete - sync 5mb 500k - stable low ping times

CatMangler

Na the karma thing was effected by me adding good karma to you, it went from 4 or 5 then suddenly to -9, oops sorry my fault must be a bug somewhere.

maxping

So you have had some PM's, why not answer them by PM instead of trying to dredge up old threads that have no relevance.

The ping issues for the majority here are no longer a problem as you can see from the "ping" thread.

The ones that are having problems are working it out with Customer Support.

As for the karma one Bad was from me (you can only vote once) so you work out how welcome your comments are here ;)





CatMangler

Perhaps my attempt to give you good karma has been "over ruled"

equk

Quote from: maxping on Oct 12, 2006, 22:24:29
So you have had some PM's, why not answer them by PM instead of trying to dredge up old threads that have no relevance.
dredging up?
All I did was post a link so people can have a better insight into the problem and how IDNet have helped. It not only has good information on IDNet official announcements, it also provides some good information to why it's happening and also how many people it happens or happened to.
Quote from: maxping on Oct 12, 2006, 22:24:29The ping issues for the majority here are no longer a problem as you can see from the "ping" thread.

The ones that are having problems are working it out with Customer Support.
Probably because they get flamed here, also the reason why people pm'd me.
Quote from: maxping on Oct 12, 2006, 22:24:29As for the karma one Bad was from me (you can only vote once) so you work out how welcome your comments are here ;)
Quote from: CatMangler on Oct 12, 2006, 22:22:26
Na the karma thing was effected by me adding good karma to you, it went from 4 or 5 then suddenly to -9, oops sorry my fault must be a bug somewhere.
As this is a community I think CatMangler has proven otherwise, unless you've suddenly taken over the forums  ???
e6400 @ 3.2Ghz 38°C 45°C | ATI X1900XT | P5W DH | ss: linux | osx
migration complete - sync 5mb 500k - stable low ping times

maxping

#91
Quote from: equk on Oct 12, 2006, 22:32:24
dredging up?
All I did was post a link so people can have a better insight into the problem and how IDNet have helped.

If you wanted to show the people who PM'd you the thread you could have sent them the link, my view is you wanted to drag a dead  thread back to the top, you say its to show people what IDNet have done to help , i think you have other motives.

I am going to leave it at that , i don't want to get into a argument with you over this, you are no longer  a  IDNet customer, why people are sending you PM's about bad pings is beyond me.

I am locking this thread , feel free to open another if you wish.