Vista SP1

Started by old Bill, Mar 18, 2008, 20:02:09

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

scook94

Well if I have to restore it'll give me some sense of confidence in Acronis itself...
Steven
--------

Rik

It's always worked for me. :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

#27
Must admit very very impressed with SP1 Never ever got anywhere near these speeds before.

http://www.speedtest.bbmax.co.uk/results.php?t=1206014035&v=3870973

O dear! A strange coincidence :mad:



Edit: Smiley markup sorted
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

talos2

 I still feel a bit unsure, I'll let it mature for a few more weeks. :whistle:
EX Orange and proud of it.

Malc


scook94

Well, I've still a few things to check out but so far the upgrade was totally painless!  ;D
Steven
--------

Rik

You see, if you wear insulating gloves and thick rubber soles, there's no problems at all. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

talos2

Quote from: Rik on Mar 20, 2008, 12:29:25
You see, if you wear insulating gloves and thick rubber soles, there's no problems at all. ;D

Thats ok ,I'ts the welding mask I don't like. :eek4:
EX Orange and proud of it.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

I am sure many of you XP SP2 users will be pleased to know that I have already had my first blue screen of death with vista SP1, plus also a minidump, the less said the better. ;D
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Ouch. Recovered OK?
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Fine thanks! Amusing it then wanders off to microsoft to find a solution and then leaves you none the wiser.
I have a nice week old image of XP sp2 its tempting to return :)
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

I know how you feel, Steve. I like to leave things that are working well alone. :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

D-Dan

Quote from: stevethegas on Mar 20, 2008, 18:16:19
I am sure many of you XP SP2 users will be pleased to know that I have already had my first blue screen of death with vista SP1, plus also a minidump, the less said the better. ;D

Yes. I always find a visit to the bathroom after a BSOD helps, too.  :whistle:
Have I lost my way?



This post doesn't necessarily represent even my own opinions, let alone anyone else's

Captain K

Quote from: D-Dan on Mar 20, 2008, 19:10:04
Yes. I always find a visit to the bathroom after a BSOD helps, too.  :whistle:

Really?  I generally find a BSOD causes a trip to the bathroom!  :del:
Bruce.

I don't trust Camels.  Or any other creature that can go a week without a drink.

Rik

You're both right, of course. :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

esh

Where's my Windows 2000 SP5?

/grumble
CompuServe 28.8k/33.6k 1994-1998, BT 56k 1998-2001, NTL Cable 512k 2001-2004, 2x F2S 1M 2004-2008, IDNet 8M 2008 - LLU 11M 2011

Rik

It's on the top shelf, next to Playboy. :) :out:
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

Windows 2000... I remember that. Great OS; just a bit slow. :eyebrow:

Simon

I skipped W2K and went straight from 98SE to XP. 
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

esh

Jumped on the Win2k boat quickly, and thank goodness I did since Windows ME was rather shambles. It's been good. So good in fact, we're only just thinking about buying licenses to upgrade the machines. XP licenses that is. XP has been pretty good since SP2!

The main criticism I level at win2k is the pretty iffy boot time. That and the USB2 support is a little tempramental. Otherwise it is absolutely fine. Caches less agressively than XP perhaps, but has a tiny (comparitively) fresh install.

Ah well, time to upgrade to XP. I'll see you Vista guys in 5 years... maybe.
CompuServe 28.8k/33.6k 1994-1998, BT 56k 1998-2001, NTL Cable 512k 2001-2004, 2x F2S 1M 2004-2008, IDNet 8M 2008 - LLU 11M 2011

Sebby

I always had a soft spot for 2000, but I just found it quite slow, even on a powerful system. XP all the way... :)

old Bill

I found this which makes Kaspersky even better value. This is the whole security package Anti Virus,Firewall ect.
http://www.kaspersky.com/kaspersky_internet_security
Compare this to ESET security package.
https://secure.eset.co.uk/order/category.asp?intCategoryId=7

Lance

Quote from: Sebby on Mar 21, 2008, 10:26:37
I always had a soft spot for 2000, but I just found it quite slow, even on a powerful system. XP all the way... :)

Indeed 2000 was one of the first NT code based OSes released for use on normal workstations and was therefore, the first of the more stable OSes. After 95 and 98, this was a real blessing!
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Windows 95 - a re-boot every hour... :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.