Rik, the FEC corrections shown on the 2700HGV stats page ?

Started by Dont mention Talk Talk !!, Mar 20, 2008, 13:44:11

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Dont mention Talk Talk !!

I was reading were you said there is a line that shows FEC error corrections and if it remains low, then its ok to leave interleaving switched OFF, can you tell me which line it is on the stats page you are referring to ?

What for example on a daily basis would be an acceptable number of errors corrected and unacceptable number also, the former to operate continually on fastpath and the latter to accentuate the need for interleaving ?

One last thing Rik, whats the expected cut off date for the finishing of the exchange work throughout the UK by BT. I think its too much of a coincidence that Ive had such upping and downing of speeds fom a utopian 6.8MB to a trouser shatting 1.4MB whilst upgrade works are going on. Can works on exchanges that are not my own have a negative impact on mine ?

Thanks dude

James


Rik

Hi James

http://192.168.1.254/xslt?PAGE=J04&THISPAGE=A02_POST&NEXTPAGE=J04

shows the error rate, the corrected blocks is the figure you want. I wouldn't like to set absolute figures on what is, or is not acceptable - if you have 2,000 errors per day, but they all occur in a one-hour period, say, then they are likely to cause you problems.

The BT work finishes today, so hopefully things will stabilise. Work elsewhere can affect you, basically anything between your master socket and the IDNet POP, see http://community.plus.net/blog/2008/02/28/how-uk-isps-are-charged-for-broadband-the-cost-of-ipstream/.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.


Dont mention Talk Talk !!

Rik do these figures suggest Fastpath stability mate ?

DSL
Link Retrains:  0  0  0  0:00:00
DSL Training Errors:  1  0  0  1 day 7:37:31
Training Timeouts:  0  0  0  0:00:00
Loss of Framing Failures:  0  0  0  0:00:00
Loss of Signal Failures:  0  0  0  0:00:00
Loss of Power Failures:  0  0  0  0:00:00
Loss of Margin Failures:  0  0  0  0:00:00
Cumulative Seconds w/Errors:  134  34  2  0:02:48
Cumulative Sec. w/Severe Errors:  0  0  0  0:00:00
Corrected Blocks:  0  0  0  0:00:00
Uncorrectable Blocks:  149  40  2  0:02:48
DSL Unavailable Seconds:  38  0  0  1 day 7:37:17


James

Rik

The lack of corrected blocks suggests you are on Fastpath.

What's it say about DSL channel on this page:

http://192.168.1.254/xslt?PAGE=J02&THISPAGE=J17&NEXTPAGE=J02
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Dont mention Talk Talk !!

DSL Connection Details  Broadband Link 
DSL Line (Wire Pair): Line 1 (inner pair)
Protocol: G.DMT Annex A
DSL Channel: Fast
DSLAM: Country: {0xB5} Vendor: {TSTC} Specific: {0x04}
ATM PVC Info: 0/38
ATM Encapsulation: Routed LLC


is that what you were looking for ? How stable would you say the connection is rik ?

James

Rik

Well, that confirms you're not interleaved. You've been up for 7 days plus with <20 errors/day. I'd say that was pretty stable, James. :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Dont mention Talk Talk !!

7163 Kbps
which is around 895.41 KB/s
including overheads.............23.05 pm


words fail me rik, they truly do mate

James

Dont mention Talk Talk !!

Quote from: Dont mention Talk Talk !! on Mar 20, 2008, 23:07:49
7163 Kbps
which is around 895.41 KB/s
including overheads.............23.05 pm


words fail me rik, they truly do mate

James



and i thought 7150k was the top whack   :laugh:

Rik

It goes to show how inaccurate speed tests are, James. They simulate data transfer and they only use a short test, so you can end up with wildly varying figures. Different testers also seem to give different results for different people. It's why I use a 'known good' site and a fairly hefty file plus stopwatch if I have any significant concerns.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Dont mention Talk Talk !!

is TB your reference site rik, i just ran a check and got

7009 Kbps
which is around 876.11 KB/s
including overheads

, thats dslzone, wonder what TB will say , ill go see

Rik

I tend to trust the BT test most, James, iac it's the only one that BT care about. ;)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.