Disconnects cured

Started by duncan, Apr 05, 2008, 21:51:16

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2 All
User actions

Gary

#25
Apr 08, 2008, 12:09:25
Quote from: Rik on Apr 08, 2008, 12:06:21
AM (I thought it recommended that somewhere)?
No it seems to just state shortwave (RF1) and the AM one
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Inactive

#26
Apr 08, 2008, 12:11:00
Quote from: Rik on Apr 08, 2008, 12:08:21
I'm a total potter's wheel this morning, In. ;)

And this afternoon as well..  ;D
Anything and everything that I post on here is purely my opinion, it ain't going to change the world, you are under no obligation to agree with me, it is purely my expressed opinion.

Gary

#27
Apr 08, 2008, 12:12:07
Quote from: Inactive on Apr 08, 2008, 12:11:00
And this afternoon as well..  ;D
Are you sure, In? Better to say all day surely ;)
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Gary

#28
Apr 08, 2008, 12:31:40
Quote from: Rik on Apr 08, 2008, 12:03:46
Afaik, Gary, the plate goes between the faceplate and the test socket. If you're talking about the KY filter, I suspect it goes before the soap on a rope filter. ADSL is, afaik, an international standard, so it's MW frequencies which affect it.
Not much good if you have an adsl face plate then as it would in effect be going after filtration of the dsl signal ???
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Rik

#29
Apr 08, 2008, 12:34:46
OTOH, it would stop AM signals getting in at that point. (However, I do wonder how much would get in in that situation.)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

#30
Apr 08, 2008, 12:41:06
Quote from: Rik on Apr 08, 2008, 12:34:46
OTOH, it would stop AM signals getting in at that point. (However, I do wonder how much would get in in that situation.)
I was thinking about trying one out Rik, just not sure of the faceplate issue.
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Steve

#31
Apr 24, 2008, 17:08:02
   Effect of KY filter RF1 over a five day period. The filter is fitted after a ADSL nation faceplate, it seems to have reduced them on this occasion by nearly 50%,  throughput   remains the same, sync is at 8096, profile 7000. D/S SNRM 13.5- 16 Downloads around 1gb/day with some P2P
    Errors
      Received FEC           :      5954
      Received CRC           :        25
      Received HEC           :        24
      Transmitted FEC        :         0
      Transmitted CRC        :         0
      Tranmsitted HEC        :         0


    Errors
      Received FEC           :      3429
      Received CRC           :        11
      Received HEC           :        10
      Transmitted FEC        :         0
      Transmitted CRC        :         0
      Tranmsitted HEC        :         0


Value of it?I am unsure? Perhaps it means I would be safe with interleave off?
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

#32
Apr 24, 2008, 17:10:07
It certainly seems to have done something. Your FEC errors about to 700/day, a bit under 30 an hour, so it might be worth trying it with interleaving off.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

#33
Apr 24, 2008, 17:31:07
I may have to order one of these things to try. ;)

It's probably worth having interleaving turned off if you want to try and get the reduced ping time, but if you're not a gamer, I wouldn't bother. :)
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2 All
User actions