New to IDNet

[vitriol]

Update

Been playing on the Xbox for the last hour, just jumped back on and decided to run a few more tests.

Ping has seemingly returned to normal

C:\Documents and Settings\vitriol>ping www.jolt.co.uk

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=29ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 22ms, Maximum = 29ms, Average = 24ms


And I've just done a speedtest at Namesco

http://www.speedtest.bbmax.co.uk/results.php?t=1208542305&v=4112592

maybe my line is doing some sort of retraining.

Will leave it for a few days yet before contacting support, no need to hassle them just yet.

[Rik]

I wonder whether your profile got chewed during the migration. Keep an eye on things and let support know if all is not well.

[MoHux]

Thanks guys,

Will do what you advise.

Looks to me though like interleaving has been enabled on my line, just looking at the ping stats.  Something I definately didn't want.

Hopefully should sort itself out over the next few days.

You would not have been able to sync' at 8128 if interleaving was turned on.  Would be 7616 or similar. 

Mo

[tomharrison]

As Mo says, with interleaving enabled you wouldn't be able to achieve the full sync. The high ping could be for a number of reasons - congested exchange, download activity, BT engineering works etc.

LLU connections generally appear to give lower pings too.

For what it's worth, my pings have increased this week for some bizarre reason. I usually ping to UK servers around 21-22ms, but it's jumped up to around 30 now. My results for Jolt are as follows:

C:\Documents and Settings\Tom>ping www.jolt.co.uk

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 35ms, Average = 33ms

Not sure what's caused it as I had IDNet opt me out of interleaving - I'd suspect BT twiddling with things .

[RA-1972]

This is mine with interleaving off . 7150 profile .
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\>ping jolt.co.uk

Pinging jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 17ms, Average = 16ms

[vitriol]

thats some sweet ping there RA

I've been playing CoD4 tonight and the ingame ping was 40 ish, so thats fine.  Also speed has dramatically increased to 6.7 meg earlier on.

If it continues like this then I'll have no worries

[vitriol]

Update

Pings are all sweet and I've just got the best speedtest I've ever had

http://www.speedtest.bbmax.co.uk/results.php?t=1208598770&v=4117083

Nice

[Rik]

You won't get much better than that. 

[vitriol]

it just did lol

http://www.speedtest.bbmax.co.uk/results.php?t=1208602218&v=4117528


Have some  everyone

[Rik]

I did say much better.

[Inactive]

it just did lol

http://www.speedtest.bbmax.co.uk/results.php?t=1208602218&v=4117528


Have some  everyone

A great result.

for the karma..