Printer,help me choose

Started by David, Apr 29, 2008, 10:04:19

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

David

Hi all Im about to get myself a new printer and have been looking at the Epson,but not sure.
What I am looking for.Would like it wireless,(not right up on the list)want it for usual stuff letters,and that.also photos.

I have suffered with Lexmark which to be honest have been good bu the refills are sometimes hard to get and expensive.Got a P4350 at present with card reader .scans reads copies etc

Without breaking the bank (Rik take note) any recommendations.

While Im at it.If I change my netgear 54 to one of 100 would it make any real difference..

Please I have watch threads and see you all love the 2 wire job,which may be beyond me to install.

So Im upgrading almost from scratch.New laptop and all sorts of toys so want to optimise things..my speeds are very good so its just a refurb.....thanks  ;)
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

The best photoprinters are not brilliant at text, David, and vice versa. Do you want a multi-function, so that you've got a copier/scanner as well?

Changing the Netgear adaptor will have no effect unless the router is capable of supporting pre-N standards.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

yes Rik I would need a multi task job,that said,its pretty rare nowadays to write and actually post a letter,the main thing is to copy documents like receipts which I need paper duplicates and the odd letters as long as the text is good Im ok with that.I use my pc has a card reader so this isn't really needed.
Is that any clearer?

As for the N in router...Rik hello..its me..N to me is  ??? ???.

Rereading what you have just posted,I am thinking will a change of router and adapters have any real effect.

sorry, ::)
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

Hi David

I don't advise the use of pre-N routers, as the standard has not been ratified yet and, until it is, you may be buying a pup, and interoperability between different makes of equipment isn't guaranteed. N is just the next letter in the chain from the present 80211.g, 54Mbps wireless and, no, I don't know what happened to H-M. :)

For the printer, take a look at:

http://www.misco.co.uk/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=245866&CatId=1430
£109.26 - wired network connection, good for text and scanning, OK for photo printing

http://www.misco.co.uk/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=293200&CatId=1430
£183.29 - wired network connection, better for photo-printing

http://www.misco.co.uk/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=256877&CatId=0
as (1) £89.29

Misco won't necessarily be the cheapest source, but it will give you an idea. Wireless networking seems to be out of fashion atm.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

2nd one looks very good,ticks all the boxes.looks good.....hmm (its in stock as well)  :thumb:
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

I'm very pleased with my Canon, David, and it's way better at text than the Epson ever was.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

It looks very very nice Rik,but so far I have the laptop,warcom,router (on list) monitor is still alive...ok just finished a new bathroom.....Im pushing my luck...all Wendy says is"if thats what you want" love her  ;D ;D
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

Can I send you my wish list for approval, David? :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

You can send it,but might get more than a groan and it wouldn't be from me.

Wendy is brilliant though she really isn't at all up on these things,only just got her to practice sending Emails but as long as the bank isn't dented too much,she is fine with it,although its the same the other way...I think its called sharing......and we have down to a fine art.... :D
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

Same here, David, but I'm lucky in that Sue likes to surf and is into digital photography... :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Noreen


Rik

She never has done, Noreen, though she is a member - though that's so that I can log in as a normal member to see the forum as others see it. Sue's not a forum sort of a person, if you know what I mean.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

john

Quote from: Rik on Apr 29, 2008, 12:34:14
Sue's not a forum sort of a person, if you know what I mean.

You mean she's got a life then, Rik  ;D

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

john

I got an all in one printer as part of the deal when I bought my Dell laptop about a year ago. It works well enough but I believe it's made by Lexmark and the cartidges are not cheap. I understand there's a mod you can make to either the printer or the cartridge so you can use Lexmark ones instead of having to buy even more expensive Dell ones.

I don't think it's as good as my old Canon printer, which used individual colour catridges but it's more convenient.

Ideally I'd like an all in one wireless printer that just did black and white and basic colour, probably a colour laser might be more cost effective to run. If I want any photographs printed I take them to one of the shops that do it as they're much cheaper and if I had to do a lot then I think a dedicated photoprinter would be better.

Lexmark seem to be the only printer manufacturer who charge reasonable prices for wireless models though.

Rik

They make it back up on the cartridges though, John. :(
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

john

Too true Rik,

Here's an article from the BBC News about them 4 years ago but the situations not changed much.

However I'm also concerned about this as I worked for over a year in a small room with a laser printer  >:(

David

#17
Quote from: john on Apr 29, 2008, 13:03:12
I got an all in one printer as part of the deal when I bought my Dell laptop about a year ago. It works well enough but I believe it's made by Lexmark and the cartidges are not cheap. I understand there's a mod you can make to either the printer or the cartridge so you can use Lexmark ones instead of having to buy even more expensive Dell ones.

I don't think it's as good as my old Canon printer, which used individual colour catridges but it's more convenient.

Ideally I'd like an all in one wireless printer that just did black and white and basic colour, probably a colour laser might be more cost effective to run. If I want any photographs printed I take them to one of the shops that do it as they're much cheaper and if I had to do a lot then I think a dedicated photoprinter would be better.

Lexmark seem to be the only printer manufacturer who charge reasonable prices for wireless models though.



Lexmark on the surface are good value I have had 2 but the cartridges range the cheapest colour I have see is Asda at around £16 for colour and £16 for black..other places add up to £5.have tried generic but keep getting the message that printer recognizes not a lexmark product,still works and I ignore it.I did try the injection kits from Argos,horrible job and to my surprise work very well,good for printing sheet music.but now getting into photography and with my Lexmark the prints are lousy so I need to change it.my daughter will get this one for all her homework and pictures she loves to create,,I am leaning towards Canon.
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

Quote from: john on Apr 29, 2008, 13:13:29
However I'm also concerned about this as I worked for over a year in a small room with a laser printer  >:(

Plus there's the ozone emissions which can cause irritation, John. The worst printers, in my experience, are the ones which allow you to top up the toner from a bottle/container. In that respect, I like HP lasers with their 'single cartridge' approach.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Quote from: badpianoplayer on Apr 29, 2008, 13:14:51
I am leaning towards Canon.

Lexmark inks are, imo, totally unsuitable for photographic use, producing very warm images. I've used Lexmark, HP, Epson and Canon inkjets, and the Canon produces by far the best image quality imo, David, though I do recommend using Canon paper and inks for best results (also use Adobe RGB as the colour space).
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

john

Quote from: Rik on Apr 29, 2008, 13:17:28
Plus there's the ozone emissions which can cause irritation, John. The worst printers, in my experience, are the ones which allow you to top up the toner from a bottle/container. In that respect, I like HP lasers with their 'single cartridge' approach.

It was about 10 years ago Rik and have not noticed any ill effects as yet. I think the printer that's not far away from me may actually be the same one but we are now in an open office. It's a HP LaserJet 5000DN.

I've always found this company quite good for replacement cartridges : Choice Stationary

Rik

Their prices seem quite competitive.  :thumb: I tend to use PhotoGlossy/MX2, but these look about the same sort of level.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

Quote from: Rik on Apr 29, 2008, 13:20:53
Lexmark inks are, imo, totally unsuitable for photographic use, producing very warm images. I've used Lexmark, HP, Epson and Canon inkjets, and the Canon produces by far the best image quality imo, David, though I do recommend using Canon paper and inks for best results (also use Adobe RGB as the colour space).


Thank Rik to be honest I don't want to buy twice and you really do know what you are talking about so will take the plunge and follow your advice regarding the paper.Lexmarks photos were so bad I stopped using that feature  :thumb:

Did you notice I actually edited that last one...getting there slow but sure  >:D
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.

Rik

Quote from: badpianoplayer on Apr 29, 2008, 13:28:54
Did you notice I actually edited that last one...getting there slow but sure  >:D
Yes, but you left an extra [/quote] on the end.  >:D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

David

Yes but I didn't say I had arrived....just getting there. :rofl:
Many hammer all over the wall and believe that with each blow they hit the nail on the head.