XP SP3 delayed due to issues with Microsoft Dynamics RMS

Started by Gary, Apr 29, 2008, 20:52:40

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Gary

The auto Download of XP SP3 and Vista SP1 have been halted due to a compatibility issue with Microsoft Dynamics RMS, details here
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Sebby

Thank goodness the direct download link is available. ;)

Gary

Quote from: Sebby on Apr 29, 2008, 20:55:23
Thank goodness the direct download link is available. ;)
The article recommends that you don't do it that way.....but they would say that Sebby to cover themselves, odd how it affects the same software issue on both Vista SP1 and XP SP3 ;)
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Sebby

Well, it's identical to what will be released on the Download Center over the coming days/weeks, so I see no reason not to if you want to install it. :)

Gary

Quote from: Sebby on Apr 29, 2008, 20:59:59
Well, it's identical to what will be released on the Download Center over the coming days/weeks, so I see no reason not to if you want to install it. :)
Its because its the whole version not just the one that your pc needs, the update version is much smaller, for me Vista SP1 was 66mb, probably MS trying to cut down on server costs  :whistle:
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Sebby

Well yes, you're right that the "network install" includes everything, whereas the update version updates the necessary components, but it makes absolutely no difference to the end result either way.

The network install is the way I do it because it saves doing the Windows Update on several computers, and it allows me to slipstream. :)

Gary

Quote from: Sebby on Apr 29, 2008, 21:07:15
Well yes, you're right that the "network install" includes everything, whereas the update version updates the necessary components, but it makes absolutely no difference to the end result either way.

The network install is the way I do it because it saves doing the Windows Update on several computers, and it allows me to slipstream. :)
Its a good way Sebby if I need to install again from scratch I would do the same, from the article it looks like Vista SP1 is being left on as a optional download where as XP is pulled completely, typical MS can't get a service pack to work with their own software ::)
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Sebby


Rik

Even more, Gary, typical MS that they didn't test it before announcing the release date!  ::)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby


Rik

As a beta-tester, I can understand how things get through, and the problems only show when a package hits the streets. In this case, though, MS seem to have picked it up themselves, which suggests that they didn't chose their beta testers well.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

Quote from: Rik on Apr 30, 2008, 09:37:25
As a beta-tester, I can understand how things get through, and the problems only show when a package hits the streets. In this case, though, MS seem to have picked it up themselves, which suggests that they didn't chose their beta testers well.
They use the public for beta testing surely, Rik >:D
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

madasahatter

Interesting Gary  :thumb:

Must admit, I do find it amusing that the incompatibility is with their own software. Find it hard to believe that when developing something, it isn't developed with their own software in mind from the start  :)

Simon

Quote from: Sebby on Apr 30, 2008, 09:24:44
Obviously beta testers didn't spot this one. :P

I thought the customers were the beta testers.   :whistle:
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Gary

Quote from: madasahatter on Apr 30, 2008, 09:48:28
Interesting Gary  :thumb:

Must admit, I do find it amusing that the incompatibility is with their own software. Find it hard to believe that when developing something, it isn't developed with their own software in mind from the start  :)
I know, I can understand with all the myriad of other products but not their own, just goes to show how overly complicated things are becoming
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

madasahatter

Quote from: Killhippie on Apr 30, 2008, 09:52:00
I know, I can understand with all the myriad of other products but not their own, just goes to show how overly complicated things are becoming

..... or the left deveopment team not passing all the information on to the right development team.........

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

Quote from: Rik on Apr 30, 2008, 09:37:25
As a beta-tester, I can understand how things get through, and the problems only show when a package hits the streets. In this case, though, MS seem to have picked it up themselves, which suggests that they didn't chose their beta testers well.

I meant it as MS don't do much testing themselves, they rely on beta testers, which won't always highlight every issue.

Rik

I agree, Sebby, but MS should have chosen their beta testers to get a full range of compatibility tests done. It sounds like their project management is flawed.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

madasahatter


Rik

It would be funny if it wasn't so... hilarious. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

mogden

I've updated this PC this morning and all seems well  :fingers:
Matt

ceci n'est pas un .sig

madasahatter

Quote from: mogden on May 07, 2008, 14:20:54
I've updated this PC this morning and all seems well  :fingers:

that's good Mogden- at least we know the new one works  :)

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.