Vista SP1 and XP SP3 gaming comparison

Started by Noreen, Jul 01, 2008, 10:23:39

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.


Rik

I still think 7 will be the OS that Vista was meant to be. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

vitriol


vitriol

anyone here installed xp sp3 yet? any comments?

Simon

Yes and no.  :)  IOW, all seems fine. 
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

Interesting article. What amazes me is that it seems as if Vista is good "under the hood". So why's it so sluggish on the surface? ???

Quote from: vitriol on Jul 01, 2008, 16:47:53
anyone here installed xp sp3 yet? any comments?

I slipstreamed it. Nothing to report, other than everything is working as well as it always did. :)

Dangerjunkie

Hi,

Running SP3 here on 2 machines. I don't use it that much (I'm in Linux mostly) but so far it's not given me any cause for concern. I run SecondLife a lot and I've certainly not seen any significant decrease in stability or 3D performance.

Quote from: Sebby on Jul 01, 2008, 20:33:13
Interesting article. What amazes me is that it seems as if Vista is good "under the hood". So why's it so sluggish on the surface? ???

The problem is down to the DRM (Digital Rights/Restrictions Management.) MS have stuck loads of things in to try and brown nose the entertainment industry. A Vista Premium machine checks you video and sound devices 30 times a second to check you're not trying to steal music or movies because they think all users are thieving <insert expletive of choice here>

The net result is huge amounts of wasted speed and a significant increase in CO2 emissions for all the power to do it.

Cheers,
Paul.

Sebby

Also, I found that disabling indexing and SuperFetch made a huge difference in performance. In fact, it was pretty quick. Why introduce features that are meant to speed things up that actually slow things down? Bizarre. :P

Dangerjunkie

Probably two of the features that speed things up for the "average" user. Unfortunately we're not average and then there's the standard MS behaviour of deciding what the customer wants then when the customer says "well, that's not what I want" the response is "well, what's wrong with your requirements then?"

vitriol

I'll install SP3 tonight if I get the chance.

BrianM

 Hi!  I installed sp3 on my windows xp3  Evesham 3 years old  desktop pc a couple of months ago from MS website, have had no problems at all. The whole process took about 30 -35 minutes.  At times i thought the download had stalled (on a few ooccasions),  i didn't interupt the process but waited until the next prompts until completion, i think patience may be one of the requirements for success and just let things run their course. Let's know how you get on vitriol.  :thumb:
Brian.
Brian

Take care of all your memories. For you cannot relive them.