Google to launch a browser

Started by Rik, Sep 02, 2008, 09:39:24

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rik

The BBC is reporting that Google is launching a browser called Chrome.

I'm not sure how much more Google I can take.  :stars:
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

Quote from: Rik on Sep 02, 2008, 09:39:24
The BBC is reporting that Google is launching a browser called Chrome.

I'm not sure how much more Google I can take.  :stars:
I think its how much more google want to take from you Rik >:D
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Inactive

I spotted that yesterday, I think I will give Google a miss on this one. ;)
Anything and everything that I post on here is purely my opinion, it ain't going to change the world, you are under no obligation to agree with me, it is purely my expressed opinion.

Gary

#3
Quote from: Inactive on Sep 02, 2008, 09:45:31
I spotted that yesterday, I think I will give Google a miss on this one. ;)
Have to agree with you there In, browser and privacy linked by Google do not sit well with me saying that if they bring these features to the table it has potential



"Stability
Each browser tab will run in its own process. These processes will be completely isolated from each other, will be killable from the operating system's process manager, and will be sandboxed to prevent them from accessing information on the user's computer.

This architecture should lead to a more stable and more consistent browsing experience: performance of the browser should not degrade over time.

Google is using its search index to prioritise testing of the browser: the pages that are linked to the most results from Google Search are getting the most automated hits to make sure Chrome is behaving correctly on them.

Speed
The browser is being written with WebKit, the open-source engine at the core of Apple's Safari and Google's Android. The browser is also getting a new JavaScript virtual machine, V8. It is claimed to be a better solution for complex and rich web applications; it should yield better performance as well as 'smoother drag and drops' in interactive applications.Chrome's architecture lends itself to secure browsing. Each web page, or tab, runs in its own process, and is blocked from accessing other processes on the computer. "We've taken the existing process boundary and made it into a jail," the comic states. Different and more flexible permissions are being developed for plug-ins, however.

A database and API to access phishing and scam sites will be used in Chrome (and made public), which will hopefully reduce 'zero-day' scam exploits. The browser will be constantly updated with this information.

Standards
The browser will be released as an open-source project. Google will also build the open-source local runtime Gears into the browser, and is hoping that it will be taken up widely to "improve the base functionality of all browsers".
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Rik

Same here - if it's true to Google of late, it will be recording everything for onward transmission. :(
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

kinmel

Quote from: Rik on Sep 02, 2008, 09:55:29
Same here - if it's true to Google of late, it will be recording everything for onward transmission. :(

.......to the U.S. Government
Alan  ‹(•¿•)›

What is the date of the referendum for England to become an independent country ?

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

vitriol


Rik

I agree, Vit. I've tried most browsers over the years, but I still like Fox best.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Gary

Quote from: vitriol on Sep 02, 2008, 09:57:40
You can't beat the Fox imo.
If Firefox take on board the sandboxing features of the google browser it would be great the feature set of the google browser read well, its just privacy which will stop me ever having it in on my pc >:(
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Gary

Quote from: vitriol on Sep 02, 2008, 09:57:40
You can't beat the Fox imo.
The reviews for IE8 will make it a catchup to FF3, so the browser wars are back on it appears :eyebrow:
Damned, if you do damned if you don't

Inactive

Quote from: vitriol on Sep 02, 2008, 09:57:40
You can't beat the Fox imo.

Agreed, I do use IE6 on occasions, and Opera now and then, but I like Fox the best. :thumb:
Anything and everything that I post on here is purely my opinion, it ain't going to change the world, you are under no obligation to agree with me, it is purely my expressed opinion.

Rik

I wonder if Jill's a foxy lady?  :angel: :whistle:
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

vitriol

#13
The Aurora bowser from Mozilla looks interesting but is not available as of yet.  At the end of the day competition between the browsers is good as it leads to innovation and more new features for us all to use and abuse.


john

Quote from: vitriol on Sep 02, 2008, 11:24:16
The Aurora bowser from Mozilla looks interesting but is not available as of yet.  At the end of the day competition between the browsers is good as it leads to innovation and more new features for us all to use and abuse.




:iagree:

I still use IE7 because I've tried other browsers and they don't offer me any features that I need, pages are more likely to be displayed propery in IE, it's better integrated into Windows and also I've got used to it.

Inactive

Quote from: john on Sep 02, 2008, 11:40:03

:iagree:

I still use IE7 because I've tried other browsers and they don't offer me any features that I need, pages are more likely to be displayed propery in IE, it's better integrated into Windows and also I've got used to it.

Strange that John, that is the one browser that I cannot get along with, I reverted to IE6.
Anything and everything that I post on here is purely my opinion, it ain't going to change the world, you are under no obligation to agree with me, it is purely my expressed opinion.

kinmel

Alan  ‹(•¿•)›

What is the date of the referendum for England to become an independent country ?

Simon

Yup, another cunning plan for Google to watch you even closer.   :eyebrow:
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

I thought of a response, but decided to self-censor.  >:D Suffice to say I don't think Google could watch any closer without access to my alimentary canal...  :o
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

vitriol

I'll give it a try when it's released, supposedly tomorrow.

Rik

My alimentary canal is being released tomorrow.  :o Stand well back!  ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Simon

That's an image I could have well done without!   :eek4:
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

kinmel

Well the new browser is lightening fast, it out performs FF3 by a big margin.

It imported FF3 bookmarks after a fashion, no the live bookmarks and just a few such as TTB are missing for no apparent reason.

There are very few options to change, so there is much less control over how tabs work etc.

It's speed alone means that I will keep trying it and see if I can adapt to it's foibles.
Alan  ‹(•¿•)›

What is the date of the referendum for England to become an independent country ?

Simon

I'm also trying it, out of curiosity, and I have to admit, it's fast, but I see nothing yet to draw me away from Sea Monkey / Firefox.  One thing I have noticed is the lack of tweakable options, and particularly, smooth scrolling is conspicuous in it's absence.
Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Philip

I'll stick with the Monkey, thanks  ;D