Bad ping times

Started by GameRuk, Oct 21, 2008, 21:53:41

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GameRuk

Hi anyones internet been sluggish and the ping times way higher than normal?
My ping allways used to be 25 nearly 2 weeks now its been like this no matter what time a day it is,i also contacted support and they see they see nothing wrong,done all the stuff that needs to be checked but no joy.I got no virus or spyware all been checked even tried on another pc its the same and i just built my m8s new pc tried his and the exact same thing am at a lost as there nothing else that i can see that i can try.Ive also just noticed that for some reason since yesterday i downloaded 4 gig going by idnet account i find this a little strange as i didnt download anything i dont use a wireless router so that not it,would love to know whats changed last 2 weeks.
http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results/id/122462191470455132272.html
the normal for me is 6967Kbps and 690 Kbps
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Game oveR>ping jolt.co.uk

Pinging jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 76ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Game oveR>tracert jolt.co.uk

Tracing route to jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2   153 ms    92 ms    84 ms  telehouse-gw2-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.55]
  3    81 ms    68 ms    53 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [212.69.63.243]

  4    51 ms    50 ms    47 ms  te2-3.cr05.hx2.bb.gxn.net [193.203.5.14]
  5    63 ms    70 ms    68 ms  vl3952.cr05.tn5.bb.gxn.net [62.72.137.9]
  6    55 ms    43 ms    42 ms  gi2-48-5.ar01.tn5.bb.gxn.net [62.72.140.14]
  7    59 ms    57 ms    63 ms  ge-0-0-0-3801.jolt-gw.cust.pipex.net [212.241.24
1.14]
  8   122 ms   122 ms   106 ms  secure.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Game oveR>tracert bbc.co.uk

Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2   164 ms    65 ms    78 ms  telehouse-gw2-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.55]
  3    70 ms    61 ms    64 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [212.69.63.243]

  4    73 ms    74 ms    69 ms  rt-lonap-b.thdo.bbc.co.uk [193.203.5.91]
  5    56 ms    51 ms    52 ms  212.58.238.133
  6    52 ms    60 ms    57 ms  virtual-vip.thdo.bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Game oveR>tracert idnet.net

Tracing route to idnet.net [212.69.36.10]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2   112 ms   105 ms   109 ms  telehouse-gw2-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.55]
  3    79 ms    79 ms    70 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [212.69.63.243]

  4    62 ms    57 ms    70 ms  redbus-gw2-g0-1-331.idnet.net [212.69.63.5]
  5    96 ms    91 ms    83 ms  redbus-gw1-fa2-0-300.idnet.net [212.69.63.225]
  6    79 ms    87 ms    78 ms  www.idnet.net [212.69.36.10]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Game oveR>

Steve

Hi

BT not sneeked interleave on? :)
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

I was also thinking interleaving. It might be worth getting in touch with IDNet. They'll be able to confirm whether it's to do with interleaving or something else, and hopefully sort it either way.

zappaDPJ

Is it possible that you have a virus? That might account for the network traffic and the high pings.
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

GameRuk

Ive asked idnet about interleaving and they say its off also they say there not a problem lol well they defo something not right somewhere,also i had tried 3 pc`s 2 which are my own and the other which is brand new that i just finshed putting together for a m8 its the same on that as well so that kinda rules out any sort of virus or spyware.Ive tried another router wired one not wireless new cables new filters took face plate off and connected it into the hidden socket but with no luck.

Rik

You're not in the Ilford area are you, GameRuk?
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ardua

Normally, I get download speeds in excess of 6Mbps. This is my latest reading:
22/10/08 10:01:39
Speed Down   437.24 Kbps ( 0.4 Mbps )
Speed Up   361.83 Kbps ( 0.4 Mbps )
Port   8095
Server   speedtest1.adslguide.org.uk

Something is going on.

Rik

Try and run a BT test, that will tell us what your profile is. Also, can you post your router's stats - downstream sync speed, attenuation and noise margin? Have you noticed the connection dropping at all?
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ardua

Rik,

I am getting nowhere with the BTSpeedtester. Their website continually states that the 'system is busy'.  My router stats are as follows:

Downstream

Connection 8128

Line Att   19

Noise Margin  11

Upstream

Connection 448

Line Att  4

Noise Margin 28

The system has been up for 163 hours. An electrician turned the power off a week ago to change a power socket. Today is the first day of slow speeds.

My latest stats (thinkbroadband) are 328.01Kbps Down and 378.77 Kpbs Up.

Rik

Exchange congestion would be my best guess, unless you're anywhere near Ilford. Contact IDNet and they can run some tests for you.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ardua

Normal service seems to have been restored:
22/10/08 11:05:44
Speed Down   6667.29 Kbps ( 6.5 Mbps )
Speed Up   370.37 Kbps ( 0.4 Mbps )
Port   8095

I did send IDNet Tech Support an e-mail with my stats and it may be that they put another 'shilling in the meter'.

Inactive

Good news... :thumb: :fingers: Thanks for the update.
Anything and everything that I post on here is purely my opinion, it ain't going to change the world, you are under no obligation to agree with me, it is purely my expressed opinion.

DarkStar

I had a very slow connection earlier, 200-400 kbps against my usual 1900kbps. I live in deep Suffolk 3+ miles from the exchange. First thing I always do if I have slow speeds is to run the BT test
www.speedtester.bt.com
I can nearly always get on it, no problem, just have to wait a little while. If the throughput speed is as normal then its IP related, if its slow then BT related. Throughput was well down this morning so I guess BT messing about, perhaps putting in a super fast connection for me  :whistle: I wish. :shake:
Anyway everything back to normal now. :ok:

Ian
Ian

Sebby


davej99

Strangely my pings have gone out too and I noticed the following:

(1) On telehouse-gw2.lo1.idnet.net (212.69.36.51) I seem to be getting pings hi 40s to low 50s versus previous typical of mid to high 20s. Interleave is on.

(2) BT Speeds are reasonable, if a bit below usual 6600+:
  DSL connection rate: 8128 kbps(DOWN-STREAM),  448 kbps(UP-STREAM)
  IP profile for your line is - 7150 kbps
  Actual IP throughput achieved during the test was - 6153 kbps

(3) Speed profile during the BT test is a bit raggy, whereas I usually see a near flat max rate  rectangular shape in DU meter. I suggest this indicates the onset of contention somewhere. DU meter tells me I have no extraneous activity.

(4) CHAP authentication is taking 2 over minutes per router log:
Wed, 2008-10-22 10:47:45 - Initialize LCP.
Wed, 2008-10-22 10:47:45 - LCP is allowed to come up.
Wed, 2008-10-22 10:48:46 - Initialize LCP.
Wed, 2008-10-22 10:48:46 - LCP is allowed to come up.
Wed, 2008-10-22 10:49:47 - Initialize LCP.
Wed, 2008-10-22 10:49:47 - LCP is allowed to come up.
Wed, 2008-10-22 10:49:56 - CHAP authentication success

(5) Largest possible non-fragmented packet is 1472 + 28 headers gives my MTU, which seems OK, though I am on the limit of my expertise here.

(6) Telnet Rx Stats look OK but as I say I am no expert.
Connection Rate:  8128 Kbps
Line Attenuation: 37 dB
Noise Margin:     11 dB

Interleave CRC:   2
Interleave FEC:   722
Interleave HEC:   0

My conclusion is that I have a good connection and setup with early stage congestion.

Would appreciate a more informed opinion.

Cheers,
Dave

Sebby

I think what you're seeing is either exchange congestion or something going on at IDNet's end. It's worth getting in touch with IDNet to see if they can detect any problems.

davej99

Thanks, Sebby.

I was reluctant to contact Tech Support without some confidence that there may be a hint of a  problem. I think you will agree it is a very minor issue that is only detectable because IDNET provide such an exemplary service. I mentioned it only because of the earlier posts on this thread.

I have noticed with previous ISPs that lengthening pings tracked with central congestion, so much so I used to poll centrals and pick the best one. I agree that exchange contention is a possibility too. I think the justification for mentioning the subject to IDNET is user feedback rather than a complaint.

Cheers,
Dave




Rik

Feedback's what they need, Dave. It wouldn't be the first time that we've highlighted an issue through the forum before they've become aware of it. The telehouse ping may just be down to low priority being given to pings if that router is busy, I'm much more concerned by the CHAP authentication delays.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

davej99

OK, Rik. I guess I was concerned not to be like the odd customers that gets ripped into IDNET  :rant2: and then discovers the problem is self-inflicted. :blush: Strange that; I am not usually so inhibited; must be the very amiable tone you help generate on the forum, Rik.

Rik

I must be slipping, Dave. :)

I think there's a huge difference between yelling down the phone (not that I'm suggesting you would) and raising a perceived phenomenon with them. I ran PingGraph for 24 hours to demonstrate that pings to idnet.net had become erratic, and it helped find an issue which didn't show on the monitoring from within the network. By working with IDNet, we are able to ensure the best possible performance, something we all want to see.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

GameRuk

Hi rik nah m8 am in wick caithness lol the highlands anyways heres the stats
ADSL Link              Downstream  Upstream
Connection Speed    8128 kbps    832 kbps
Line Attenuation      26 db          6.5 db
Noise Margin           9 db            14 db

The router never drops sync or disconnects and bt speed tester dont work for me so i cant run that,i dont think idnet will do anything as they said they tested it and its fine but surly it cant be i dont care about the download if i had 512k connection it wouldnt bother my as long as the pings fine but atm it aint.

Rik

It looks like your line is fine, full sync with some noise margin in hand, and interleaving doesn't appear to be on. The reason I mentioned Ilford is that there's been a major BT outage there in the past couple of days, but it wouldn't affect you (nice place you're in, btw :thumb:).

I'm guessing at BT work or congestion being at the route of your problem. Is your router pingable? If so, contact IDNet and they can run some tests to see what they get from their end to you. It might also be worth running PingGraph for some hours (up to 24 preferably) to see if there's any fluctuating pattern. If there are specific servers affected, ping them, otherwise ping www.idnet.net.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

GameRuk

yes my router is pingable and idnet had done the tests and say its fine and the ping time are some to any servers its all the same m8..

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

vitriol

No problems here, very strange problem you've got though

Pinging www.jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=58
Reply from 82.133.85.65: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=58

Ping statistics for 82.133.85.65:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 20ms, Maximum = 22ms, Average = 21ms

Pinging www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.251.195] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.251.195: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.251.195: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.251.195: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.251.195: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 212.58.251.195:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 26ms, Average = 24ms

Pinging www.idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 22ms, Average = 21ms