Could someone trace this for me please?

Started by ThinIce, Jan 25, 2007, 19:21:43

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ThinIce

Would some kind soul(s) trace / pathping this for me from their Idnet connections?

83.142.228.117

Am thinking of migrating in and this is my gaming clan's dedicated server, so it needs a good route  ::)

Would also be interested into how people find IDnet to jolt, gameservers.net, multiplay etc etc etc

Thanks!

Thin

maxping

#1
Tracing route to 83.142.228.117 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.254
  2     *      846 ms    58 ms  212.69.63.41
  3    27 ms    24 ms    24 ms  212.69.63.10
  4     *        *       25 ms  213.232.64.54
  5     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  6     *       27 ms    29 ms  217.239.38.242
  7    25 ms    26 ms     *     217.239.39.230
  8     *       26 ms     *     217.6.48.238
  9     *        *        *     Request timed out.
10    26 ms    24 ms    26 ms  83.142.228.117

This is a trace to my fave CoD2 server, strange how 2 are  fine and the other is cr*p.

Tracing route to 195.20.109.103 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.254
  2    26 ms    23 ms    23 ms  212.69.63.41
  3    29 ms    25 ms    27 ms  212.69.63.10
  4    25 ms    25 ms    27 ms  193.203.5.134
  5    28 ms    25 ms    24 ms  62.249.255.186
  6    28 ms    26 ms    25 ms  217.146.81.254
  7    26 ms    25 ms    24 ms  195.20.109.103


Tracing route to jolt.co.uk [82.133.85.65]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.254
  2    25 ms    24 ms    24 ms  212.69.63.41
  3    24 ms    27 ms    28 ms  212.69.63.10
  4    56 ms    51 ms    53 ms  193.203.5.14
  5    25 ms    24 ms    25 ms  62.72.137.9
  6    25 ms    25 ms    24 ms  62.72.140.14
  7    25 ms    25 ms    26 ms  212.241.241.14
  8    27 ms    26 ms    28 ms  82.133.85.65





ThinIce

Cheers. I'd have thought that the hops not returning a response just don't reply to ICMP or give it a very low priority? - otherwise that looks pretty good to me

maxping

Have some pings on me  :laugh:

Pinging 83.142.228.117 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 83.142.228.117:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 28ms, Average = 25ms



Pinging 83.142.228.117 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=26ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 83.142.228.117:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 27ms



Pinging 83.142.228.117 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 83.142.228.117:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 33ms, Average = 27ms

MoHux

Here's some of mine to the same address;

Pinging 83.142.228.117 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=57
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=57
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=57
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 83.142.228.117:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 16ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 17ms

Pinging 83.142.228.117 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=57
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=57
Request timed out.
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 83.142.228.117:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 3, Lost = 1 (25% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 17ms

Pinging 83.142.228.117 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=57
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=57
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=57
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=57

Ping statistics for 83.142.228.117:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 18ms, Average = 17ms

;D
"It's better to say nothing and be thought an idiot - than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

stevelondon



Tracing route to 83.142.228.117 over a maximum of 30 hops

  1    77 ms    99 ms    99 ms  dsldevice.lan [192.168.1.254]
  2    31 ms    17 ms    13 ms  telehouse-gw-msdp.idnet.net [212.69.63.41]
  3    14 ms    13 ms    13 ms  212.69.63.10
  4    14 ms    13 ms    13 ms  x-s-1.lon1.arbinet.net [213.232.64.54]
  5     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  6   226 ms   128 ms    16 ms  217.239.38.242
  7    14 ms    13 ms    13 ms  217.239.39.230
  8    17 ms    16 ms    34 ms  217.6.48.238
  9    14 ms    14 ms    15 ms  ge-1-21_22.kit.sov.lon.rapidswitch.com [87.117.2
14.22]
10    14 ms    12 ms    12 ms  83.142.228.117

Trace complete.



Pinging 83.142.228.117 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=56
Reply from 83.142.228.117: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 83.142.228.117:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 11ms, Maximum = 13ms, Average = 12ms




ThinIce

Much appreciated all - doesn't look like I should have any problems by the looks of those  :D