Ping times Jan 28 onwards

Started by MarkE, Jan 28, 2009, 13:49:28

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lance

Mine are back to normal too!
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

VaderDSL


Rik

Same here. I'm about to fire off my last email of the day to support.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Glenn

This what I have got, the spike is happening approx every 25 minutes

[attachment deleted by admin]
Glenn
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Bit different to the pattern I am seeing, Glenn...

[attachment deleted by admin]
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

DarkStar

All gone haywire again


C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping idnet.co.uk

Pinging idnet.co.uk [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=144ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 98ms, Maximum = 146ms, Average = 129ms


C:\Documents and Settings\Owner>ping bbc.co.uk

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=136ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=158ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 212.58.224.138:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 136ms, Maximum = 159ms, Average = 149ms

Ian
Ian

g7pkf

Mine look ok (on GW5)


C:\Users\Dean>ping idnet.co.uk -t

Pinging idnet.co.uk [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=15ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 9, Received = 9, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 13ms, Maximum = 17ms, Average = 15ms
Control-C
^C
C:\Users\Dean>

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Mohux_Jnr

Now I am not one to moan as you can probably see from my post count but I am sure somebody worded the recent e-mail I recieved wrongly, downgrade surely would have been more appropriate.
I am hoping this will only be short term until the techies are back at their stations on Monday as I have generally, before the recent change been happy with the service.

C:\Users\Jons>ping idnet.co.uk

Pinging idnet.co.uk [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=151ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 119ms, Maximum = 164ms, Average = 139ms

My download speeds are also all over the place, averaging 2.5 Meg compared to the high 6 Meg prior to the upgrade. I hope this is not the norm for what we can expect from the recent changes?.


Rik

I'm sure it isn't the norm, or what was planned, but rather some sort of teething problems. Capacity has been increased with a new 155M central plus the Gigabit Hostlink, so it won't be any congestion problems, but rather, I suspect, some unexpected interaction between the new routers and the existing network. But I'm only guessing, until IDNet say something, that's all I can do.

How's your dad, I haven't seen him in lately? :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Mohux_Jnr

Thanks for the response Rik, he is fine, saw him today and he was still sat in the usual spot in front of a PC monitor :). We are both in the same town so I suspect he has been experiencing the same issues so my guess is it will not be long before you hear from him, I am just suprised he has not beaten me to it!.

He is slipping  :o



mrapoc

Just came across this thread and unfortunately im going to have to jump on the bandwagon of the bad ping brigade  :bawl:

iv contacted support and asked if there is anything I can do to help remedy my problem

but yeh

gaming pings have been steadily increasing over the last months from a good 30ms average to a 70ms average


Simon_idnet

Looks like we need to do more work on getting the Centrals balanced properly. We'll be making this the priority over the next few days.
Simon

MarkE

Quote from: ducky22 on Feb 01, 2009, 15:06:25
Back to the dial up days (nearly!)... Already checked with various computers and only one turned on at a time. Browsing is also laggy. Anyone else having problems today? Download speed down from 830k/second to 45k/second.

Tracing route to bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2   166 ms   182 ms   178 ms  telehouse-gw4-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.97]
  3   148 ms   165 ms   156 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [212.69.63.243]

  4   164 ms   147 ms   139 ms  rt-lonap-b.thdo.bbc.co.uk [193.203.5.91]
  5   156 ms   142 ms   121 ms  212.58.238.133
  6   149 ms   136 ms   141 ms  virtual-vip.thdo.bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138]

Trace complete.

M:\>



Welcome to my world as of the past few days ...






uk server  and my ping time is over 150ms and unplayable









cjenkins

Yep back to black  :mad:

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.138] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=121
Reply from 212.58.224.138: bytes=32 time=153ms TTL=121

Ping statistics for 212.58.224.138:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 130ms, Maximum = 174ms, Average = 154ms

I'd prefer Simon's response if it said "We'll be making that the priority this evening".

neocr0n

I know simon_idnet has already replied but I thought I would post my results too.  Currently reside In the North East.  I've had gaming ping problems for 3/4 days now.  Times varey but mainly between 3 and 9pm.

Tracing route to multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.22]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    11 ms     4 ms     3 ms  router [192.168.0.1]
  2   103 ms   284 ms   133 ms  telehouse-gw2-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.55]
  3   147 ms   139 ms   132 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [212.69.63.243

  4   116 ms   111 ms   125 ms  lonap2.enta.net [193.203.5.135]
  5   125 ms   119 ms   273 ms  te4-4.telehouse-east.core.enta.net [87.127.236.
7]
  6   118 ms   102 ms   107 ms  te5-4.global-switch.core.enta.net [87.127.236.8
]
  7   101 ms    88 ms    81 ms  te1-1.interxion.core.enta.net [87.127.236.86]
  8    75 ms    66 ms    57 ms  gi4-3.enta-transit.as35028.net [84.45.252.122]
  9   106 ms   111 ms   110 ms  po0-1-651-cr.ixnlon.as35028.net [85.236.110.11]

10    83 ms    78 ms    75 ms  www1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.22]

Trace complete

Play Counter-Strike 1.6 online 6 years and counting. :(

zappaDPJ

My latency has been fine until today, now it's abysmal  :(

Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6001]
Copyright (c) 2006 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

C:\Users\zappaDPJ>ping www.multiplay.co.uk

Pinging core1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.22] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=124
Reply from 85.236.96.22: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=124

Ping statistics for 85.236.96.22:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 87ms, Maximum = 112ms, Average = 96ms

C:\Users\zappaDPJ>tracert www.multiplay.co.uk

Tracing route to core1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.22]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms     1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.0.1
  2   114 ms   134 ms   108 ms  telehouse-gw2-lo2.idnet.net [212.69.63.55]
  3   120 ms   114 ms   122 ms  telehouse-gw3-g0-1-400.idnet.net [212.69.63.243]

  4    81 ms    78 ms    79 ms  lonap2.enta.net [193.203.5.135]
  5   101 ms   103 ms   100 ms  te4-4.telehouse-east.core.enta.net [87.127.236.9
7]
  6    95 ms   102 ms    90 ms  te5-4.global-switch.core.enta.net [87.127.236.82
]
  7    78 ms    76 ms    80 ms  te1-1.interxion.core.enta.net [87.127.236.86]
  8    74 ms    68 ms    59 ms  gi4-3.enta-transit.as35028.net [84.45.252.122]
  9   176 ms   187 ms   223 ms  po0-1-651-cr.ixnlon.as35028.net [85.236.110.11]

10    84 ms    85 ms    95 ms  www1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.22]

Trace complete.

C:\Users\zappaDPJ>
zap
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Lance

Mine are high again on DSL4...

C:\Users\Lance>ping idnet.net -n 10

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=162ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=181ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=167ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 162ms, Maximum = 182ms, Average = 174ms
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Glenn

Mine rose too

[attachment deleted by admin]
Glenn
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Lance

Attached is my latest graph, showing things settled down again about 21:50 but had a bit of a rough patch at about 22:12 for quarter of an hour or so.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Simon_idnet

Tonight's re-balancing of the Centrals seems to have worked. We'll be keeping a close eye on the situation to make sure that it doesn't happen again. Apologies for the poor performance this evening.
Simon

Lance

Thanks Simon. My pings on the whole are back to normal for my line (between 30ms and 35ms) but I'm still getting short periods - 20 seconds at a time - where I get pings in excell of 100ms.
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

mrapoc

C:\Users\Sam>ping www.idnet.net

Pinging www.idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 51ms, Average = 49ms

Used to be 25-30 ms  :(




Lance

My last post should read in excess, not excell! Stupid left and right hands!
Lance
_____

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Sebby

I always write words that I didn't mean to, Lance. :)