Digital SLR Suggestions

Started by davej99, Jul 16, 2009, 15:52:06

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

davej99

Does anyone have a recommendation for an entry level DSLR or paraDSLR (looks feels, manually controls like an SLR but no mirror). Must have TTL view finder, ease of manual use, low noise and 28mm min focal. Video not important at all, nor long focal zoom or lens mount. Price point under £600. Any thoughts Rik?

Ray

If you don't want a full DSLR, Dave, have a look at these by Panasonic they look like an SLR and are a similar size and are very good, this model gets excellent reviews, I have the previous model to this one and I am very happy with it.  :)
Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Try the Nikon D60, Dave.

Amazon have it for £377.90, if you have access toa  CostCo you can get a better deal there.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Can recommend the Canon EOS 400D excellent, especially with the EFS 17-85 IS USM lens,The latest is the 450D I believe.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

trophymick

I have two DSLR's both Pentax's, the K100D Super and the K10D both are excellent cameras and are built like tanks with stainless steel frames.
The K10D has weather and dust sealing.
I went for Pentax for the lens compatibility, nearly all the old manual lens will work on my cameras, the list is endless. :thumb:
The model up from mine is the K20D, it has a larger sensor and a few more whistles and bells, it's well within your budget.

Have a look on here  http://www.srsmicrosystems.co.uk/   I can't recommend them (SRS) highly enough for service. :thumb:
Let us know what you end up with.
Mick

psp83

Quote from: Rik on Jul 16, 2009, 16:26:07
Try the Nikon D60, Dave.

I agree with Rik, i have a D60 and its a great camera.

Rik

I believe Nikon optics are probably the best of the lot, Paul, and their camera designs are first rate now. Examples I've seen from the D90 at 3200 ISO are unbelievably good.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

davej99

Thanks for the advice, everyone.

I think I have gravitated towards a DSLR rather than a compact that behaves like a DSLR. Also inclined towards CMOS rather than CCD for speed/noise. I think that blows my budget. However, my Pentax SLR is about 25yrs old so I dont think it is extravagant. It cost about £300 in 1982, but I am not sure the lenses are much use today. I have not really tried a DSLR, but the AF seems painfully slow at times. Any thoughts on a mid range (ie not Pro) choice.

Thx Dave

Rik

Nikon D90, about £770 with kit lens.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

davej99

Strange you should say that Rik, I just read a review and it does really well. That might be the one.

Thx, Dave.

(Heard you were on tour in God's own recently. Was it good?)

Rik

It was brilliant, Dave, thanks. :)
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

davej99

How about the Nikon D5000 with the angleable screen, great if you wear varifocals?

Rik

That has a lot going for it (I hate using cameras with vari-focals, it makes life a real pain!).
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

davej99

To see a flat screen I have to wind my head back as far as it will go and lean over backwards like Fred Dibnah. Out doors the screen is hardy readable anyway and viewing face up to the sun blinds you for a week. Laying in a hide you need to double back over like a gymnast checking for hemaroids!

Rik

:rofl: :karmic:

Being short-sighted, I usually revert to wearing a distance prescription and lifting them to read the camera's details...
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

trophymick

Quote from: davej99 on Jul 17, 2009, 10:14:57
Thanks for the advice, everyone.

I think I have gravitated towards a DSLR rather than a compact that behaves like a DSLR. Also inclined towards CMOS rather than CCD for speed/noise. I think that blows my budget. However, my Pentax SLR is about 25yrs old so I dont think it is extravagant. It cost about £300 in 1982, but I am not sure the lenses are much use today. I have not really tried a DSLR, but the AF seems painfully slow at times. Any thoughts on a mid range (ie not Pro) choice.

Thx Dave



Have a look on here Dave  http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/  it lists all the Pentax lens and what is/not compatible. :thumb:
Mick