Connection Issue - Interference?

Started by Swerv, Dec 05, 2010, 23:39:28

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Steve

Certainly removing the bell wire reduces the interference induced into the adsl signal , I was looking a your stats posted earlier when you had a sync of 3008, somethings changed somewhere, can you carry on with routerstats overnight with the router plugged into the test socket with a fresh filter if you've got one.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Swerv

That sync speed was last night though Steve.  The connection has been out completely until late in the evening.  On that basis do you think that the sync speed could jump this evening?

Apologies if I'm being thick here, but is/can the sync speed be affected by interference?

I'll run the stats this evening again, certainly.  I've got Telnet running at the mo as well.  WRT to the Telnet stats, why would the upstream attenuation be double that reported on the router stats (28 vs 14)?

Swerv

Minor update:

Downstream NM has rocketed to 21db  :o

Steve

If it stays at 21db I suspect you've been placed on a banded profile although the sync you posted i.e 672 is not typical of an upper band limit, if routerstats is showing a constant nm of 21 I'd be tempted to try a resync as you've now got plenty of excess margin if the interference has now gone.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Swerv

Err, wow.  Just rebooted and:

ADSL Link    Downstream    Upstream
Connection Speed    4352 kbps    864 kbps
Line Attenuation    47 db    14.5 db
Noise Margin    5 db    11 db


Simon

Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Swerv

A few graphs for everyones' delectation. 






Rik

Quote from: Swerv on Dec 07, 2010, 19:31:19
Well it wasn't connecting at all until I removed the bell wire.  So can removing the wire have reduced the susceptibility to interference enough such that it is now able to connect but just not at a decent speed?

It can, but I'd check that you haven't loosened there wires on terminals 2/5 to be on the safe side.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Quote from: Swerv on Dec 08, 2010, 10:01:16
A few graphs for everyones' delectation. 

I'd be inclined to try a 2-Wire 2700 router looking at that, <£20 delivered from eBay. Are all three graphs after the ringwire was disconnected?
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

Certainly seems to settle down around daybreak.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Swerv

Rik, all 3 graphs are from after removing the bell wire, yes.  

The graphs are taken from pretty much when I rebooted the router, following Steve's suggestion after I noticed the NM rocket.

I'll take a look at the router you mentioned.

Rik

Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Swerv

As an aside, is there any benefit to having an NTE5 fitted btw?  Or does the cost to get BT out to do it negate its worth?

Ooh, I just remembered, we have a couple of BT Homehub things lying around the office not being used....

Rik

There is, and it's often quite cheap to get BT to fit one, around £30. The problem is finding a sales rep who knows that.
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Swerv

I have acquired a 2700.  Don't know firmware yet, but it's a dual SSID jobbie.  Can someone point me in the right direction as to where to go with this?  I've found various sites, but could do with one which runs from start to finish as to what I need to do.

Simon

Simon.
--
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Swerv


Ted

Ted
There's no place like 127.0.0.1

Swerv

Ok guys.  Got home and thought I'd check the stats.  Before doing so I setup the security on it.  It had been running without, as the Mrs' company laptop refused to connect.  She's since had a better WLAN utility installed by her IT team, in place of the bobbins Windows one.

Anyhoo, MAC filtering on and WPA-PSK.  These are the current stats:

ADSL Link    Downstream    Upstream
Connection Speed    3456 kbps    64 kbps
Line Attenuation    47 db    14 db
Noise Margin    8 db    8 db

Downstream NM is still all over the place.

So why on earth has the upstream sync plummeted?  ???

Steve

Is it  being reported correctly? Browsing won't be easy with such a poor upstream. The upstream tends to be less affected by noise as the frequencies used are lower. Any noise on the phone line, any broadband drops on phone calls? Have got another adsl filter to try?
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Swerv

It's taking a while to load pages.  e.g. a good 10s to load all the smileys and icons that are present on the reply console on here.

But tested phone and no noise on the line, no broadband drops.

Steve

I think I'd see what support have to say tomorrow,
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Swerv

Yep.  Will do Steve.  Just done a reboot and:

ADSL Link    Downstream    Upstream
Connection Speed    4224 kbps    864 kbps
Line Attenuation    47 db    14 db
Noise Margin    7 db    11 db

Frustrating.

Steve

It is as that looks fine, although when dealing with support (especially when faults are suspected), supporting BT speedtests are very helpful to them.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.