Sudden increase in ping

Started by Ray, May 14, 2011, 08:51:56

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ray

Quote from: Steve on May 14, 2011, 18:59:28
What evidence are you using Ray to say that interleave has not been applied?

I was going by the fact that my IP profile and synch speed hadn't changed, Steve, but having Telnetted into the router this morning and displaying the adsl status it would seem that interleaving has been re applied.  :(



> adsl status
  --------------------------- ATU-R Info (hw: annex A, f/w: annex A) -----------
   Running Mode            :    G.DMT       State                : SHOWTIME
   DS Actual Rate          :  8128000 bps   US Actual Rate       :   832000 bps
   DS Attainable Rate      : 10016000 bps   US Attainable Rate   :  1324000 bps
   DS Path Mode            :  Interleave    US Path Mode         :  Interleave
   DS Interleave Depth     :       64       US Interleave Depth  :        4
   NE Current Attenuation  :       27 dB    Cur SNR Margin       :       12  dB
   DS actual PSD           :    19. 9 dB    US actual PSD        :    12. 4   dB
   ADSL Firmware Version   : 232201_A
  -------------------------------- ATU-C Info ---------------------------------
   Far Current Attenuation :       13 dB    Far SNR Margin       :       16  dB
   CO ITU Version[0]       : 00005453       CO ITU Version[1]    : 00005443
   DSLAM CHIPSET VENDOR    : < TI >
>

Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Steve

I guess that's what I suspected Ray, you've almost certainly got a modem chipset that allows a full sync and thus max profile with interleave on.
Steve
------------
This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ray

Looks that way, Steve, looks like I will probably have to put up with it as I've had interleaving removed once already.
Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Technical Ben

I dread the day mine ever gets turned back on.
Option 1) I get 1 error in 3 years. The exchange carries on as normal, that's 99.99999999999% correct sync and data throughput.
Option 2) I get 1 error in 3 years, BT panics like it's the end of the world, and turn on interleaving for the rest of time.

I know which option is least problematic. Strange how BT are the only "problem" in that list.  >:(
I use to have a signature, then it all changed to chip and pin.

esh

Apparently when I changed to IDNet that counted as a service disruption and interleaving got applied :D
CompuServe 28.8k/33.6k 1994-1998, BT 56k 1998-2001, NTL Cable 512k 2001-2004, 2x F2S 1M 2004-2008, IDNet 8M 2008 - LLU 11M 2011

pctech

Amazing also how a feature designed to stabilise lines causes such much problem too.


Rik

Quote from: esh on May 15, 2011, 13:48:04
Apparently when I changed to IDNet that counted as a service disruption and interleaving got applied :D

It would do if you moved from BT.  :evil:
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

pctech

My earlier post should have read 'such problems too'

Please excuse my Engrish  ;D

Rik

I thought it was an 87, Sweet and sour such much. ;D
Rik
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.

Ray

Ray
--------------------

This post reflects my own views, opinions and experience, not those of IDNet.