Changing from ADSL Lite to FTTC

[zimmerframe]

Hi all,

It is ages since I posted on here.  I haven't gone away just retired

Anyway, after many years, I am still with idnet for my ISP.  I currently have their ADSL Lite package.  I am considering going over to their FTTC service since this is offered at my exchange.  I would probably pick the Fibre Lite package

I have spoken to idnet a couple of times but thought I would post a couple of questions on here too.

As I understand it, BT supply the change and also fit one of their modems.  If I wish to utilise WiFi in my home, I would have to supply my own wireless router.  Idnet have said they could supply a Xyzol modem.  However, I would prefer to supply my own.  I am looking at the Netgear R7000 AC1900.  It has received very good revues. Does anyone know if this router would be suitable?  Is anyone using it?

If I place an order, I believe it would be 7-10 days before BT made the change.  I guess that idnet would keep me informed and that help would be available after the change to make the appropriate setting changes to whatever router I decide to buy?

Any advice would be greatly received.

[Gary]

Dont touch the R7000 look at the Netgear forums, you will see the issues that have plagued that and are now plaguing the R8000. You really dont need something like that, its like 3D TV AC 1900 routers are pointless and seem to have lots of issues. THe R6300v2 is ample enough for and ac based router and Asus also make very good ones as well.


http://forum1.netgear.com/forumdisplay.php?f=153

[zimmerframe]

Many thanks for the "heads up"

I read a glowing revue of the R7000 in a recent PC-Pro.  It seems that in the real world, its a little different perhaps.  I'll take a look at the R6300v2.

My main internet access is via wired RJ45 direct to my current router.  I am using a donkey's years old and very reliable, Netgear DG834G.  I am familiar with its setup and due to its reliability, I thought I would go again with Netgear.  However, I also have a Netgear powerline Wi-Fi range extender on my home network.  This is used for wireless access, mainly by laptop, tablet and phones.  The DG834 is located at the front of my house and its wireless range is poor, hence the extender.  I wanted something with better range so that I could dispense with the Powerline extender.

[Gary]

Many thanks for the "heads up"

I read a glowing revue of the R7000 in a recent PC-Pro.  It seems that in the real world, its a little different perhaps.  I'll take a look at the R6300v2.

My main internet access is via wired RJ45 direct to my current router.  I am using a donkey's years old and very reliable, Netgear DG834G.  I am familiar with its setup and due to its reliability, I thought I would go again with Netgear.  However, I also have a Netgear powerline Wi-Fi range extender on my home network.  This is used for wireless access, mainly by laptop, tablet and phones.  The DG834 is located at the front of my house and its wireless range is poor, hence the extender.  I wanted something with better range so that I could dispense with the Powerline extender.

The R6300v2 is a 3x3 802.11.ac router it covers my bungalow and I have no black spots and its in the corner or one room not the centre of my home. It has amplifiers for both the 5Ghz and 2.4Ghz and works very well. No issues using it in the year I have been so far. The latest firmware update really has made it sparkle. It has a powerful dual core processor hitting 800Mhz and 256mb ram  and beamforming which can help legacy 802.11n devices it goes though three walls pushing 1080P Video to my TV quite happily. AC1750 routers are more  than enough, the AC1900 are just marketing, and not needed at all unless you have another one to act as a bridge because there are very few if any devices that operate 600Mbps over 2.4Ghz and considering how crowded 2.4Ghz is its not worth the worry. Something like the R6300v2 is much more powerful than your old DG834. Modern routers are getting more buggy as they push more into them to try and get people to part with their cash.

[zimmerframe]

I've looked at the R6300 on several retailers websites.  How can you be sure you are getting the "v2" device?  On Amazon for instance, it is sold as the Netgear R6300-100UKS AC1750.  Is that the same?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Netgear-R6300-100UKS-AC1750-Wireless-Router/dp/B008KX64OK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1406711886&sr=8-1&keywords=r6300v2

Its on Fleabay but I am guessing they are Far East imports.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/like/251598292785?limghlpsr=true&hlpv=2&ops=true&viphx=1&hlpht=true&lpid=108&device=c&adtype=pla&crdt=0&ff3=1&ff11=ICEP3.0.0&ff12=67&ff13=80&ff14=108&ff19=0

[Gary]

I've looked at the R6300 on several retailers websites.  How can you be sure you are getting the "v2" device?  On Amazon for instance, it is sold as the Netgear R6300-100UKS AC1750.  Is that the same?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Netgear-R6300-100UKS-AC1750-Wireless-Router/dp/B008KX64OK/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1406711886&sr=8-1&keywords=r6300v2

Its on Fleabay but I am guessing they are Far East imports.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/like/251598292785?limghlpsr=true&hlpv=2&ops=true&viphx=1&hlpht=true&lpid=108&device=c&adtype=pla&crdt=0&ff3=1&ff11=ICEP3.0.0&ff12=67&ff13=80&ff14=108&ff19=0

v1 is discontinued now, Amazon are selling the v2 as it has a USB3 port(see specs)  v1 is much bigger and no longer supported Also the box says smart wifi (amazon).

[colirv]

When I moved to FTTC I bought a Netgear WNR2200. It's proved reliable, and they can be had for less than £40. You might have to leave the powerline adaptors in place , but you'd save a fair bit!

[zimmerframe]

v1 is discontinued now, Amazon are selling the v2 as it has a USB3 port(see specs)  v1 is much bigger and no longer supported Also the box says smart wifi (amazon).

Thanks Gary, R6300 v2 it is then 

[Broadback]

Off topic, but note to Zimmerframe. I find the constant flashing of your "subliminal joke" rather irritating, am I alone in this?

[Baz]

not too irritating but its blockable 

sorry Zimmerframe

[zimmerframe]

Off topic, but note to Zimmerframe. I find the constant flashing of your "subliminal joke" rather irritating, am I alone in this?

Sorry about that but I have been using that as a signature for many years, right from when I joined Idnetters back in around 2005.  It reflects my sense of humour I'm afraid....

Block it by all means if it annoys you but I'm afraid I wont be removing it

[Steve]

I'm not really troubled by it but it's easy enough to block should you wish.

[colirv]

As is zimmerframe, when it comes to it.

[Clive]

I wish I still had my gas oven.  Strange that I haven't missed it until now....

[Simon]

[Gary]

Flashing things like that signature can set off occular migraines for me http://www.allaboutvision.com/conditions/ocular-migraine.htm , its a real no no, so its blocked. The trouble is unless you use an adblocker its visible from outside the forum so blocking signatures does not help. tbh it does do my head and eyes in and maybe Zimmerframe could consider the effects it may have on others as this effects my vision.

[Broadback]

Perhaps someone could let me know how to block it? My expertise is so lacking!

[Simon]

I've taken the liberty of doing it for you, BB - hope that's OK. 

For reference, it's Profile (from the top menu) > Modify Profile > Look and Layout > Don't show users' signatures.

[Broadback]

That is great, thanks Simon

[Simon]

Just to mention, you need to be logged in for the option to be in effect.   

[nowster]

You could also install an adblocker like Adblock Plus, then right click on the image and select "Adblock Plus: Block image..."  (This assumes you're using Firefox.)

[Broadback]

Roger, over and out (for now)