Please BT can i go faster????

[Colin Burns]

my darn line seems to have hit a road block on speed

DSL Line (Wire Pair):     Line 1 (inner pair)
Protocol:    G.DMT Annex A
Downstream Rate:    7616 kbps
Upstream Rate:    832 kbps
Channel:    Interleaved
Current Noise Margin:    11.0 dB (Downstream) 16.0 dB (Upstream)
Current Attenuation:    24.7 dB (Downstream) 12.5 dB (Upstream)
Current Output Power:    19.8 dBm (Downstream) 12.4 dBm (Upstream)
DSLAM Vendor Information:    Country: {0xB5} Vendor: {TSTC} Specific: {0x00}
PVC Info:    0/38

but i supose it nice that im getting the same results from the test socket as i get with all the digi boxes pluged in.

[Rik]

Looks like you have interleaving on, Colin.

[Sebby]

Yep, it'll be interleaving. I can't say for definite, but I suspect your line would be fine interleaving off, which would allow you to sync at 8,128 and give you a 7,150 profile.

[Lance]

What I would do have those stats!!!

[Danni]

I think he will take at least 2 weeks to contact IDNet to ask for interleaving to be turned off.

[Lance]

[g7pkf]

makes me sick

stats like that shouldnt be allowed.

give me his address i have a spare attenuator...

[Sebby]

[Colin Burns]

lol

and this line once apon a time wouldnt go above 4.5 just goes to show how much an improvment you get if BT replace all the wiring in your street.

[Colin Burns]

well the phone call has been placed which resulted in me having to e-mail them

[Sebby]

Excellent.

[Colin Burns]

what is the idnet support email address

[Sebby]

support@idnet.net

[Inactive]

Where did you find that Seb?, surely not on the IDNet Web Pages.

[Rik]

 

Or here.

[Sebby]

It's a secret address that only we know. 

[Danni]

It's so secret that I know it, and I'm not even a customer

[Colin Burns]

welll

with interleaveing off i get a sync of

DSL Connection Details
DSL Line (Wire Pair):    Line 1 (inner pair)
Protocol:    G.DMT Annex A
Downstream Rate:    8128 kbps
Upstream Rate:    832 kbps
Channel:    Fast
Current Noise Margin:    9.0 dB (Downstream) 14.0 dB (Upstream)
Current Attenuation:    24.9 dB (Downstream) 12.5 dB (Upstream)
Current Output Power:    19.8 dBm (Downstream) 12.4 dBm (Upstream)
DSLAM Vendor Information:    Country: {0xB5} Vendor: {TSTC} Specific: {0x00}
PVC Info:    0/38

[Rik]

What are your pings like now, Colin?

[Sebby]

You've now got full sync, Colin. You should see your profile update to 7150 in a few days.

[Colin Burns]

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\colin>ping bbc.co.uk

Pinging bbc.co.uk [212.58.224.131] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=32ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=122
Reply from 212.58.224.131: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=122

Ping statistics for 212.58.224.131:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 31ms, Maximum = 71ms, Average = 44ms

C:\Documents and Settings\colin>ping idnet.net

Pinging idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 49ms, Average = 43ms

C:\Documents and Settings\colin>

[Rik]

I suspect you may have traded speed for stability to an extent, Colin. It would be worth plotting a larger number of pings, either with the -n switch, say -n 100, or using Ping Plotter or Pin Graph. If you ran a 24 hour test to IDNet with the latter, then let support have the results, they could look at what is happening.

[Colin Burns]

could it be a result of the profile still being at 6500k

[Rik]

No, the variation in pings wouldn't be affected by the profile but could be being affected by packet loss.

By comparison, mine are in a tighter group:

ping www.idnet.net

Pinging www.idnet.net [212.69.36.10] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=25ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=28ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=59
Reply from 212.69.36.10: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=59

Ping statistics for 212.69.36.10:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 23ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 26ms

[g7pkf]

No, the variation in pings wouldn't be affected by the profile but could be being affected by packet loss.

By comparison, mine are in a tighter group:

you mean your jitter is less Rik

Dean Being perdantic